Suppr超能文献

在儿童急诊科使用组织粘合剂进行裂伤修复。

Laceration repair using a tissue adhesive in a children's emergency department.

作者信息

Bruns T B, Simon H K, McLario D J, Sullivan K M, Wood R J, Anand K J

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Egleston Children's Hospital, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, USA.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 1996 Oct;98(4 Pt 1):673-5.

PMID:8885944
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of a tissue adhesive, Histoacryl Blue (HAB), for laceration repair in children.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized clinical trial.

SETTING

A tertiary care pediatric emergency center at Egleston Children's Hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Children who presented for laceration repair between October 1994 and February 1995 were prospectively evaluated. Patients less than 1 or greater than 18 years of age, those with lacerations greater than 5 cm, and those with lacerations located on the eyelids, ears, nose, lips, hands, feet, joints, or perineum were excluded.

INTERVENTIONS

Following consent and routine wound management, including subcutaneous closure when deemed necessary, patients were randomized to receive skin sutures or HAB for cutaneous closure.

METHODS

Length of time required for laceration repair was recorded. Parental perception of the pain experienced by their child was assessed using a visual analogue scale. Photographic documentation of scar appearance at the 2-month follow-up visit was evaluated by plastic surgeons using a visual analogue scale.

RESULTS

Sixty-one children were enrolled: HAB group (N = 30), suture group (N = 31). No differences occurred between groups in laceration length, depth, location, or patient demographics. Length of time required for repair was decreased (median, HAB 7 minutes vs suture 17.0 minutes) and parental assessment of their child's pain was significantly less in the HAB group. Parents were more likely to recommend HAB over suturing to other parents or guardians. Cosmetic outcome in the HAB group was assessed to be as good as, or better than, the cosmetic outcome in the suture group as evaluated by two plastic surgeons.

CONCLUSION

The use of HAB for laceration repair is an acceptable alternative to conventional suturing with a comparable cosmetic outcome. Advantages include less pain to the child, no need for suture removal, and more efficient use of physician time. Parents were also more likely to recommend HAB over suturing for laceration repair.

摘要

目的

确定组织黏合剂Histoacryl Blue(HAB)用于儿童撕裂伤修复的有效性。

设计

前瞻性随机临床试验。

地点

埃格尔斯顿儿童医院的三级儿科急诊中心。

参与者

对1994年10月至1995年2月期间前来进行撕裂伤修复的儿童进行前瞻性评估。排除年龄小于1岁或大于18岁、撕裂伤大于5厘米以及撕裂伤位于眼睑、耳朵、鼻子、嘴唇、手、脚、关节或会阴部位的患者。

干预措施

在获得同意并进行常规伤口处理(必要时包括皮下缝合)后,将患者随机分为接受皮肤缝合或HAB进行皮肤闭合。

方法

记录撕裂伤修复所需的时间。使用视觉模拟量表评估家长对其孩子所经历疼痛的感知。在2个月的随访时,由整形外科医生使用视觉模拟量表对瘢痕外观的照片记录进行评估。

结果

共纳入61名儿童:HAB组(N = 30),缝合组(N = 31)。两组在撕裂伤长度、深度、位置或患者人口统计学特征方面无差异。修复所需时间减少(中位数,HAB组7分钟,缝合组17.0分钟),HAB组家长对其孩子疼痛的评估明显更低。家长更有可能向其他家长或监护人推荐HAB而非缝合。两位整形外科医生评估HAB组的美容效果与缝合组相当或更好。

结论

使用HAB进行撕裂伤修复是传统缝合的一种可接受替代方法,美容效果相当。优点包括对儿童疼痛较小、无需拆线以及更有效地利用医生时间。家长也更有可能推荐使用HAB而非缝合来修复撕裂伤。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验