Smith G A, Strausbaugh S D, Harbeck-Weber C, Shields B J, Powers J D, Hackenberg D
Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Pediatrics. 1996 Mar;97(3):301-7.
To compare the effectiveness of four topical anesthetics that do not contain cocaine with that of topical tetracaine-addrenaline-cocaine (TAC) and lidocaine infiltration during laceration repair in children.
This was a randomized, blinded trial.
The study was conducted in the emergency department of a large children's hospital.
Subjects were children 2 years of age or older with a laceration 5 cm or less in length that required sururing.
Patients were randomly assigned to receive one of four noncocaine-containing topical anesthetics, topical TAC, or lidocaine infiltration anesthesia before laceration repair.
Outcome measures assessed pain perceptions using a Visual Analogue Scale, Likert scale, and Anethetic Effectiveness scale. Distress behaviors of patients were measured with the Restrained Infants and Children Distress Rating Scale.
Two hundred forty patients were enrolled in the study. Using alpha = 0.05 and beta = 0.2, there was statistical power to detect differences of 0.3 to 1.3 U for the outcome measures used. The bupivacaine-norepinephrine topical solution (Bupivanor) performed better than the other three new topical preparations. It provided effective wound anesthesia during lacertion repair, especially for lacerations of the face and scalp, where it was consistently rated as effective as TAC and 1% lidocaine infiltration by all observer groups for all outcome measures. There was a 4% overall wound complication, including one wound infection.
Bupivanor is an effective alternative to TAC and lidocaine infiltration for local anesthesia during laceration repair, expecially on the face and scalp. The effectiveness of Bupivanor on the face is important, because it is here where TAC is most likely inadvertently to come into contact with mucous membranes and result in systemic toxicity. Because pain and distress scores did not take into consideration the pain associated with the initial injection of lidocaine, the findings of this study conservatively estimate Bupivanor's effectiveness, compared with lidocaine infiltration.
比较四种不含可卡因的局部麻醉剂与丁卡因-肾上腺素-可卡因(TAC)局部用药及利多卡因浸润麻醉在儿童裂伤修复中的效果。
这是一项随机双盲试验。
研究在一家大型儿童医院的急诊科进行。
研究对象为2岁及以上、伤口长度5厘米及以下且需要缝合的儿童。
在裂伤修复前,患者被随机分配接受四种不含可卡因的局部麻醉剂之一、TAC局部用药或利多卡因浸润麻醉。
观察指标采用视觉模拟评分法、李克特量表和麻醉效果量表评估疼痛感受。使用婴幼儿约束性痛苦评定量表测量患者的痛苦行为。
240例患者纳入研究。采用α = 0.05和β = 0.2,对于所使用的观察指标,有检测0.3至1.3个单位差异的统计学效力。布比卡因-去甲肾上腺素局部溶液(Bupivanor)的表现优于其他三种新型局部制剂。在裂伤修复过程中,它能提供有效的伤口麻醉,尤其是对于面部和头皮的裂伤,所有观察组在所有观察指标上均一致认为其效果与TAC和1%利多卡因浸润相当。总体伤口并发症发生率为4%,包括1例伤口感染。
在裂伤修复的局部麻醉中,Bupivanor是TAC和利多卡因浸润麻醉的有效替代方法,尤其适用于面部和头皮。Bupivanor在面部的有效性很重要,因为正是在此处TAC最有可能意外接触到黏膜并导致全身毒性。由于疼痛和痛苦评分未考虑与最初注射利多卡因相关的疼痛,与利多卡因浸润相比,本研究结果保守地估计了Bupivanor的有效性。