Zileli M, Coşkun E, Ozdamar N, Ovül I, Tunçbay E, Oner K, Oktar N
Department of Neurosurgery, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.
Eur Spine J. 1996;5(4):243-50. doi: 10.1007/BF00301327.
The diagnosis and management of intramedullary spinal cord tumors have been significantly influenced by new diagnostic and surgical tools such as MRI, ultrasonic aspiration, intraoperative ultrasound, and evoked potential monitoring. In this study we compared the surgical results of our earlier cases using conventional methods with more recent cases using these new methods. We report our experience based on 44 adult cases. Histologic diagnosis revealed ependymoma (20 cases), astrocytoma (15 cases), glioblastoma multiforme (1 case), and other histologic diagnoses (8 cases). We performed 20 gross total resections, 19 partial resections, and 5 biopsies. The mean follow-up period was 25.8 months (3 months-10 years). Surgical results were improvement in 11 patients (25%), stabilization in 24 (54%), and deterioration in 9 (20%). The first 28 cases (group A) were diagnosed using conventional myelography and CT myelography. The more recent 16 cases (group B) were diagnosed with MRI and operated on using techniques such as ultrasonic aspiration, intraoperative monitoring and ultrasound imaging. Radical surgery (total excision) was performed in 36% (n = 10) of group A, while it was possible in 62% (n = 10) of group B. Deterioration after operation was noted in 28% (n = 8) of group A, but only 6.2% (n = 1) of group B. These results stress the importance of a preoperative MRI scan and the positive effects of intraoperative ultrasound imaging, ultrasonic aspiration, and evoked potential monitoring on surgical results. With the help of these tools, most intramedullary spinal cord tumors may be diagnosed and treated surgically with significantly decreased risk. Radical surgery was possible in as many as 62% of our more recent patients. Partial resection with radiotherapy should be confined to patients with high-grade astrocytomas.
脊髓髓内肿瘤的诊断和治疗受到诸如磁共振成像(MRI)、超声吸引术、术中超声以及诱发电位监测等新的诊断和手术工具的显著影响。在本研究中,我们比较了采用传统方法治疗的早期病例与采用这些新方法治疗的近期病例的手术结果。我们报告了基于44例成年患者的经验。组织学诊断显示室管膜瘤(20例)、星形细胞瘤(15例)、多形性胶质母细胞瘤(1例)以及其他组织学诊断(8例)。我们进行了20例全切除、19例部分切除和5例活检。平均随访期为25.8个月(3个月至10年)。手术结果为11例患者改善(25%),24例稳定(54%),9例恶化(20%)。前28例(A组)采用传统脊髓造影和CT脊髓造影进行诊断。近期的16例(B组)采用MRI进行诊断,并使用超声吸引术、术中监测和超声成像等技术进行手术。A组36%(n = 10)的患者进行了根治性手术(全切),而B组62%(n = 10)的患者可以进行根治性手术。A组28%(n = 8)的患者术后出现恶化,而B组仅6.2%(n = 1)的患者出现恶化。这些结果强调了术前MRI扫描的重要性以及术中超声成像、超声吸引术和诱发电位监测对手术结果的积极影响。借助这些工具,大多数脊髓髓内肿瘤可以通过手术进行诊断和治疗,风险显著降低。在我们近期的患者中,多达62%的患者可以进行根治性手术。对于高级别星形细胞瘤患者,应局限于采用部分切除并结合放疗。