Goldsmith D F
California Public Health Foundation, Berkeley 94704-1103, USA.
Occup Med. 1996 Jul-Sep;11(3):433-49.
One of the most important roles for occupational epidemiology is to provide a scientific basis for assessing causation. This chapter discusses the criteria for causation considered by the U.S. Surgeon General, the International Agency for Research on Cancer, and others to place the evidence in historical context. As a case study, the criteria for judging the evidence for potential carcinogenicity of silica dust are examined. The importance of communication with workers and management about causal concerns from workplace exposures is also discussed.
职业流行病学最重要的作用之一是为评估因果关系提供科学依据。本章讨论了美国卫生局局长、国际癌症研究机构等所考虑的因果关系标准,以便将证据置于历史背景中。作为一个案例研究,我们审视了判断矽尘潜在致癌性证据的标准。同时还讨论了就工作场所接触所引发的因果关系问题与工人及管理层进行沟通的重要性。