• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用自发性咳痰和诱导咳痰来测量哮喘患者气道炎症指标。

Spontaneous and induced sputum to measure indices of airway inflammation in asthma.

作者信息

Pizzichini M M, Popov T A, Efthimiadis A, Hussack P, Evans S, Pizzichini E, Dolovich J, Hargreave F E

机构信息

Asthma Research Group, Department of Medicine, St. Joseph's Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996 Oct;154(4 Pt 1):866-9. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.154.4.8887576.

DOI:10.1164/ajrccm.154.4.8887576
PMID:8887576
Abstract

Inhalation of hypertonic saline to induce sputum may alter cells and fluid-phase markers in sputum. We have compared indices of inflammation in sputum produced spontaneously with sputum induced by an aerosol of hypertonic saline. Twenty-three asthmatics produced spontaneous followed by induced sputum on the same day. The sputum specimen was separated from saliva within 2 h, dispersed with dithiothreitol (DTT) and processed to obtain cytospins and supernatant. The statistical power to detect a 20% difference in sputum parameters was > 90%. Results are expressed as median and interquartile range [IQR]. Induced sputum had a higher proportion of viable cells (77.0 [19.0] versus 47.0 [38.0]%, p < 0.001), less squamous cell contamination (1.0 [1.2] versus 1.8 [34.0]%, p < 0.001) and better quality cytospins (score of 8.0 [4.0] versus 4.0 [2.0], p < 0.001). It also had lower fluid-phase levels of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) (1,358 [1,102] versus 1,574 [2,479] microg/L) and fibrinogen (1,560.0 [3,130.0] versus 4,350.0 [5,970.0] ng/ml) but only the latter was significantly different (p = 0.02). Induced sputum was similar to spontaneous sputum in weight (200.0 [219.0] versus 270.0 [227.0] mg), total cell count (3.3 [4.1] versus 3.5 [4.5] x 10(6)/ml), proportion of nonsquamous cells, and levels of tryptase. The agreement between induced and spontaneous measurements was good, but fluid-phase levels were affected by the low viability of some spontaneous samples. We conclude that for the indices measured in asthmatic subjects, induced sputum separated from saliva is similar to lower respiratory secretions expectorated spontaneously and has the advantage of better cell viability.

摘要

吸入高渗盐水诱导痰液可能会改变痰液中的细胞和液相标志物。我们比较了自发性痰液与高渗盐水气雾剂诱导产生的痰液中的炎症指标。23名哮喘患者在同一天先咳出自发性痰液,随后诱导出痰液。痰液标本在2小时内与唾液分离,用二硫苏糖醇(DTT)分散,并进行处理以获得细胞涂片和上清液。检测痰液参数20%差异的统计功效>90%。结果以中位数和四分位数间距[IQR]表示。诱导痰液中活细胞比例更高(77.0[19.0]%对47.0[38.0]%,p<0.001),鳞状细胞污染更少(1.0[1.2]%对1.8[34.0]%,p<0.001),细胞涂片质量更好(评分8.0[4.0]对4.0[2.0],p<0.001)。其嗜酸性粒细胞阳离子蛋白(ECP)的液相水平也较低(1358[1102]对1574[2479]μg/L)和纤维蛋白原(1560.0[3130.0]对4350.0[5970.0]ng/ml),但只有后者有显著差异(p=0.02)。诱导痰液在重量(200.0[219.0]对270.0[227.0]mg)、总细胞计数(3.3[4.1]对3.5[4.5]×10⁶/ml)、非鳞状细胞比例和类胰蛋白酶水平方面与自发性痰液相似。诱导测量与自发测量之间的一致性良好,但液相水平受一些自发样本低活力的影响。我们得出结论,对于哮喘患者中测量的指标,从唾液中分离出的诱导痰液与自发咳出的下呼吸道分泌物相似,并且具有细胞活力更好的优势。

相似文献

1
Spontaneous and induced sputum to measure indices of airway inflammation in asthma.采用自发性咳痰和诱导咳痰来测量哮喘患者气道炎症指标。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996 Oct;154(4 Pt 1):866-9. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.154.4.8887576.
2
Indices of airway inflammation in induced sputum: reproducibility and validity of cell and fluid-phase measurements.诱导痰中的气道炎症指标:细胞和液相测量的可重复性和有效性
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996 Aug;154(2 Pt 1):308-17. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.154.2.8756799.
3
Cellular and biochemical analysis of induced sputum from asthmatic and from healthy subjects.哮喘患者和健康受试者诱导痰的细胞及生化分析。
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993 May;147(5):1126-31. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/147.5.1126.
4
Sputum in severe exacerbations of asthma: kinetics of inflammatory indices after prednisone treatment.哮喘重度急性加重期的痰液:泼尼松治疗后炎症指标的动力学变化
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 May;155(5):1501-8. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.155.5.9154849.
5
Induced sputum cell and fluid-phase indices of inflammation: comparison of treatment with dithiothreitol vs phosphate-buffered saline.诱导痰细胞及液相炎症指标:二硫苏糖醇与磷酸盐缓冲盐水治疗的比较
Eur Respir J. 1997 Jun;10(6):1336-40. doi: 10.1183/09031936.97.10061336.
6
Relationship between induced sputum cell counts and fluid-phase eosinophil cationic protein and clinical or physiologic profiles in mild asthma.轻度哮喘患者诱导痰细胞计数与液相嗜酸性粒细胞阳离子蛋白及临床或生理特征之间的关系
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1999 Jun;82(6):559-65. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63167-5.
7
Eosinophil activation markers in induced sputum in asthmatics.哮喘患者诱导痰中的嗜酸性粒细胞活化标志物
Korean J Intern Med. 2000 Jan;15(1):1-7. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2000.15.1.1.
8
Comparison of two methods of processing induced sputum: selected versus entire sputum.两种诱导痰处理方法的比较:选定痰液与全部痰液
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Feb;157(2):665-8. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.157.2.9705095.
9
Airway inflammation in asthma and perennial allergic rhinitis. Relationship with nonspecific bronchial responsiveness and maximal airway narrowing.哮喘和常年性变应性鼻炎中的气道炎症。与非特异性支气管反应性及最大气道狭窄的关系。
Allergy. 2000 Apr;55(4):355-62. doi: 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2000.00312.x.
10
Effect of low-dose beclomethasone dipropionate on asthma control and airway inflammation.低剂量二丙酸倍氯米松对哮喘控制和气道炎症的影响。
Eur Respir J. 1998 Jun;11(6):1240-7. doi: 10.1183/09031936.98.11061240.

引用本文的文献

1
Discovery and Validation of a Volatile Signature of Eosinophilic Airway Inflammation in Asthma.哮喘嗜酸性气道炎症挥发性特征的发现和验证。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Nov 1;210(9):1101-1112. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202310-1759OC.
2
Asthma control and sputum eosinophils in adult patients: a cross-sectional study in southern Brazil.成人哮喘控制与痰嗜酸性粒细胞:巴西南部的一项横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 5;13(1):21464. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48381-1.
3
New insights into the pathophysiology and therapeutic targets of asthma and comorbid chronic rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyposis.
哮喘和伴或不伴鼻息肉的慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的病理生理学和治疗靶点的新见解。
Clin Sci (Lond). 2023 May 18;137(9):727-753. doi: 10.1042/CS20190281.
4
Current Understanding of Asthma Pathogenesis and Biomarkers.当前对哮喘发病机制和生物标志物的认识。
Cells. 2022 Sep 5;11(17):2764. doi: 10.3390/cells11172764.
5
Eosinophilic Asthma, Phenotypes-Endotypes and Current Biomarkers of Choice.嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘、表型-内型及当前的首选生物标志物
J Pers Med. 2022 Jun 30;12(7):1093. doi: 10.3390/jpm12071093.
6
Methods of Sputum and Mucus Assessment for Muco-Obstructive Lung Diseases in 2022: Time to "Unplug" from Our Daily Routine!2022 年黏液阻塞性肺病的痰和黏液评估方法:是时候“摆脱”我们的日常习惯了!
Cells. 2022 Feb 25;11(5):812. doi: 10.3390/cells11050812.
7
Sputum procalcitonin: a potential biomarker in stable bronchiectasis.痰液降钙素原:稳定期支气管扩张症的一种潜在生物标志物。
ERJ Open Res. 2021 Oct 25;7(4). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00285-2021. eCollection 2021 Oct.
8
Biomarkers for Severe Asthma: Lessons From Longitudinal Cohort Studies.重症哮喘的生物标志物:纵向队列研究的经验教训
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2021 May;13(3):375-389. doi: 10.4168/aair.2021.13.3.375.
9
Bacteria and sputum inflammatory cell counts; a COPD cohort analysis.细菌和痰炎症细胞计数;COPD 队列分析。
Respir Res. 2020 Nov 1;21(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01552-4.
10
Sputum Inflammometry to Manage Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations: Beyond Guidelines.痰液炎症测定法在慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期管理中的应用:超越指南
Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2020 Jul;83(3):175-184. doi: 10.4046/trd.2020.0033. Epub 2020 Jun 18.