Suppr超能文献

乳腺癌中的雌激素和孕激素受体:酶免疫测定与免疫细胞化学测定的计算机辅助图像分析之间的比较

Estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer: comparison between enzyme immunoassay and computer-assisted image analysis of immunocytochemical assay.

作者信息

Cavaliere A, Bucciarelli E, Sidoni A, Bianchi G, Pietropaoli N, Ludovini V, Vitali R

机构信息

Institute of Pathological Anatomy and Histology, Perugia University, Italy.

出版信息

Cytometry. 1996 Sep 15;26(3):204-8. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19960915)26:3<204::AID-CYTO4>3.0.CO;2-E.

Abstract

Evaluation of estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptor content is now an important procedure in the management of breast cancer patients. Production of monoclonal antibodies to ER and PR has permitted development of an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and immunocytochemical assay (ICA). This study compared the results of ICA and EIA to evaluate ER and PR in 197 breast cancers using the same monoclonal antibodies. The ICA results were obtained by automated computer-assisted image analysis using CAS 200. The cut-off values adopted were 15 fmol/mg protein for EIA and 10% of the positive neoplastic area of the nuclei for ICA. For statistical analysis, Spearman's correlation coefficient and chi 2 were used. There was good correlation between ICA and EIA for both ER (r = 0.714; p < 0.0001) and PR (r = 0.815; P < 0.0001). Of 197 tumors, 136 (69.04%) were ER-ICA+, and 138 (70.05%) were ER-EIA+; 111 (56.35%) were PR-ICA+, and 115 (58.38%) were PR-EIA+. Results were concordant, positive or negative with both methods, in 175 cases for ER and in 173 cases for PR. ER and PR results were only discordant in 22 and 24 cases, respectively. Concordance of results obtained by the two methods was 88.83% (P < 0.0001) for ER and 87.81% (P < 0.0001) for PR. Correlation of results obtained by EIA and ICA to determine ER and PR was good. The data obtained suggest that ICA with automated image analysis is an effective means for evaluating ER and PR content in human breast cancer, especially when, as happens ever more frequently nowadays, the tumor is too small to perform EIA or when retrospective studies are performed.

摘要

评估雌激素(ER)和孕激素(PR)受体含量目前是乳腺癌患者管理中的一项重要程序。针对ER和PR的单克隆抗体的产生使得酶免疫测定(EIA)和免疫细胞化学测定(ICA)得以发展。本研究使用相同的单克隆抗体比较了ICA和EIA评估197例乳腺癌中ER和PR的结果。ICA结果通过使用CAS 200的自动计算机辅助图像分析获得。采用的临界值为EIA为15 fmol/mg蛋白质,ICA为细胞核阳性肿瘤区域的10%。进行统计分析时,使用了Spearman相关系数和卡方检验。ER(r = 0.714;p < 0.0001)和PR(r = 0.815;P < 0.0001)的ICA和EIA之间均具有良好的相关性。在197个肿瘤中,136个(69.04%)为ER-ICA阳性,138个(70.05%)为ER-EIA阳性;111个(56.35%)为PR-ICA阳性,115个(58.38%)为PR-EIA阳性。两种方法的结果在175例ER和173例PR中呈一致、阳性或阴性。ER和PR结果仅在22例和24例中不一致。两种方法获得的结果一致性在ER方面为88.83%(P < 0.0001),在PR方面为87.81%(P < 0.0001)。EIA和ICA用于确定ER和PR的结果相关性良好。所获得的数据表明,采用自动图像分析的ICA是评估人类乳腺癌中ER和PR含量的有效手段,特别是当肿瘤如今越来越频繁地过小而无法进行EIA或进行回顾性研究时。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验