Booth R E, Crowley T J, Zhang Y
Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver 80211, USA.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 1996 Sep;42(1):11-20. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(96)01257-4.
This study was designed to assess the effect of client characteristics and community interventions on treatment entry and retention, and to evaluate the relative effectiveness of treatment, compared to other interventions, in reducing drug use and crime among out-of-treatment opiate injectors. Subjects (N = 2973) from 15 cities were randomly assigned to: standard intervention (SI)-HIV testing and counseling; or enhanced intervention (EI)-SI plus additional educational sessions stressing responsible drug use. EI in some cities included staff assistance with treatment admission (i.e. "active' referral). All locations provided intervention by community outreach workers. Factors positively associated with treatment entry included: prior treatment, intervention by community workers, assignment to the EI, not injecting cocaine, injecting opiates, and fewer program interventions received. Sites where the EI included active referral achieved significantly higher treatment entry rates than sites where the EI did not. Findings supported the efficacy of treatment over other interventions in reducing drug use and arrests, the addition of staff assistance to facilitate clients' entry into treatment, and the involvement of community outreach workers in achieving treatment entry.
本研究旨在评估服务对象特征及社区干预措施对治疗参与率和留存率的影响,并与其他干预措施相比,评估治疗措施在减少未接受治疗的阿片类注射者的药物使用和犯罪方面的相对有效性。来自15个城市的2973名受试者被随机分配到:标准干预措施(SI)——HIV检测与咨询;或强化干预措施(EI)——SI加上强调负责任用药的额外教育课程。部分城市的EI还包括工作人员协助治疗入院(即“积极”转诊)。所有地点均由社区外展工作者提供干预服务。与治疗参与呈正相关的因素包括:既往治疗经历、社区工作者的干预、被分配到EI组、不注射可卡因、注射阿片类药物以及接受的项目干预较少。EI包含积极转诊的地点的治疗参与率显著高于EI不包含积极转诊的地点。研究结果支持了治疗措施在减少药物使用和逮捕方面比其他干预措施更有效,增加工作人员协助以促进服务对象接受治疗,以及社区外展工作者参与促进治疗参与。