Bowl R
School of Continuing Studies, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, England.
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 1996 Autumn;42(3):165-80. doi: 10.1177/002076409604200301.
Recent legislation in the U.K., particularly the NHS and Community Care Act 1990, has encouraged the direct participation of service users in the planning and management of care services. This paper explores evidence of how the interests of service users experiencing mental distress are represented within community care services in the U.K. and the extent to which this leads to a devolution of power to those service users. The evidence is drawn from a survey of principal officers in social services departments responsible for mental health services and interviews with 135 service users. This reveals considerable confusion about the meaning and purpose of user involvement and about how service users can best be represented; little evidence, despite users' interest in it, of power-sharing; and limited commitment of resources to make further participation possible. The conclusion considers how, in the light of this evidence, Central and Local Government might further develop user involvement.
英国最近的立法,尤其是1990年的《国民健康服务与社区护理法案》,鼓励服务使用者直接参与护理服务的规划和管理。本文探讨了在英国社区护理服务中,经历精神困扰的服务使用者的利益是如何得到体现的,以及这在多大程度上导致了权力向这些服务使用者的下放。证据来自对负责心理健康服务的社会服务部门主要官员的调查,以及对135名服务使用者的访谈。这揭示了对于使用者参与的意义和目的,以及如何才能最好地代表服务使用者,存在相当大的困惑;尽管使用者对此感兴趣,但几乎没有权力共享的证据;而且用于使进一步参与成为可能的资源投入有限。结论思考了根据这些证据,中央和地方政府如何能够进一步推动使用者参与。