• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A comparison of fluvoxamine and fluoxetine in the treatment of major depression.

作者信息

Rapaport M, Coccaro E, Sheline Y, Perse T, Holland P, Fabre L, Bradford D

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla 92037, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1996 Oct;16(5):373-8. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199610000-00005.

DOI:10.1097/00004714-199610000-00005
PMID:8889909
Abstract

This randomized, double-blind, parallel-group design study of 100 outpatients with major depressive disorder is the first study in the United States to compare the efficacy and tolerability of fluvoxamine (100-150 mg/day) and fluoxetine (20-80 mg/day). After a variable, single-blind, washout period, patients were randomized to receive either fluvoxamine (51 patients) of fluoxetine (49 patients) for 7 weeks. Efficacy was assessed with the 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), and Clinical Global Impressions scale for severity and improvement. Eighty-four percent of each treatment group completed the study with each group having a mean score at end point of less than 10. Both groups demonstrated a 60% improvement in HAM-D scores over the 7-week trial. There were no statistically significant differences observed between the two groups on any efficacy parameter. The medications were well tolerated, with only two patients in each group who were terminated because of side effects. There were differences in the side-effect profiles, with fluvoxamine being associated with less nausea than fluoxetine. In summary, fluvoxamine and fluoxetine were equally effective in reducing depressive symptoms, but the two drugs displayed slightly different side-effect profiles.

摘要

相似文献

1
A comparison of fluvoxamine and fluoxetine in the treatment of major depression.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1996 Oct;16(5):373-8. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199610000-00005.
2
Fluvoxamine versus imipramine and placebo: a double-blind comparison in depressed patients.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1996 Jun;11(2):119-27.
3
Fluvoxamine versus fluoxetine in major depressive episode: a double-blind randomised comparison.
Hum Psychopharmacol. 2003 Jul;18(5):379-84. doi: 10.1002/hup.490.
4
Evaluation of double-blind comparison of fluvoxamine and paroxetine in the treatment of depressed outpatients in menopause transition.氟伏沙明与帕罗西汀治疗围绝经期门诊抑郁症患者的双盲对照评估。
J Med. 2004;35(1-6):151-62.
5
Randomized, double-blind comparison of venlafaxine and fluoxetine in outpatients with major depression.文拉法辛与氟西汀治疗门诊重性抑郁症的随机双盲对照研究
J Clin Psychiatry. 1998 Jul;59(7):352-7. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v59n0703.
6
A double-blind multicenter trial comparing sertraline and fluoxetine in outpatients with major depression.一项比较舍曲林和氟西汀治疗门诊重度抑郁症患者的双盲多中心试验。
J Clin Psychiatry. 1995 Jun;56(6):229-37.
7
Fluoxetine versus sertraline and paroxetine in major depression: tolerability and efficacy in anxious depression.氟西汀与舍曲林及帕罗西汀治疗重度抑郁症:对伴有焦虑的抑郁症的耐受性及疗效
J Affect Disord. 2000 Aug;59(2):119-26. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(99)00131-7.
8
Mirtazapine: efficacy and tolerability in comparison with fluoxetine in patients with moderate to severe major depressive disorder. Mirtazapine-Fluoxetine Study Group.米氮平:与氟西汀治疗中重度重度抑郁症患者的疗效及耐受性比较。米氮平-氟西汀研究组
J Clin Psychiatry. 1998 Jun;59(6):306-12.
9
Fluvoxamine maleate in the treatment of depression: a single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison with imipramine in outpatients.马来酸氟伏沙明治疗抑郁症:一项在门诊患者中进行的单中心、双盲、安慰剂对照并与丙咪嗪比较的研究
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1996 Apr;16(2):113-20. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199604000-00003.
10
A double-blind, randomized, group-comparative study of the tolerability and efficacy of 6 weeks' treatment with mirtazapine or fluoxetine in depressed Chinese patients.一项关于米氮平或氟西汀治疗中国抑郁症患者6周的耐受性和疗效的双盲、随机、组间对照研究。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2003 Aug;64(8):921-6. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v64n0810.

引用本文的文献

1
An Overview of the Systematic Reviews About the Efficacy of Fluvoxamine on Depression.氟伏沙明治疗抑郁症疗效的系统评价概述
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 May 12;18(5):711. doi: 10.3390/ph18050711.
2
Network Meta-Analysis and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of New Generation Antidepressants.新一代抗抑郁药的网状Meta分析与成本效益分析
CNS Drugs. 2015 Aug;29(8):695-712. doi: 10.1007/s40263-015-0267-6.
3
Fluoxetine versus other types of pharmacotherapy for depression.氟西汀与其他类型的抑郁症药物治疗对比。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 17;2013(7):CD004185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004185.pub3.
4
Fluvoxamine versus other anti-depressive agents for depression.氟伏沙明与其他抗抑郁药治疗抑郁症的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17;2010(3):CD006114. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006114.pub2.
5
Comparative risk for harms of second-generation antidepressants : a systematic review and meta-analysis.第二代抗抑郁药危害的比较风险:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Drug Saf. 2008;31(10):851-65. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200831100-00004.
6
Fluoxetine versus other types of pharmacotherapy for depression.氟西汀与其他类型抗抑郁药物治疗对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD004185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004185.pub2.
7
Inhibition of G protein-activated inwardly rectifying K+ channels by fluoxetine (Prozac).氟西汀(百忧解)对G蛋白激活的内向整流钾通道的抑制作用。
Br J Pharmacol. 2003 Mar;138(6):1119-28. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705172.
8
[Changes in antidepressants consumption in the health area of Zamora from 1996 to 1999].[1996年至1999年萨莫拉健康区域抗抑郁药消费情况的变化]
Aten Primaria. 2001 Sep 30;28(5):333-9. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(01)70385-x.
9
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for late-life depression: a comparative review.用于老年期抑郁症的选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂:一项比较性综述。
Drugs Aging. 2001;18(5):355-68. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200118050-00006.
10
Systematic review and guide to selection of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂的系统评价与选择指南
Drugs. 1999 Apr;57(4):507-33. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199957040-00005.