Guglielmino-Matessi C R, Gluckman P, Cavalli-Sforza L L
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1979 May;50(4):549-64. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330500407.
Two types of data, anthropometric and gene frequencies, may be used to reconstruct human evolution. Previous research, reconstructing the history of racial differentiation on the basis of gene frequencies, indicated that the major separation between human groups was that between Africans and Europeans on one side and peoples from Australia, East Asia and Americas on the other. A similar attempt by Howells ('73b), based on skull measurements in 17 ancient populations, in agreement with earlier anthropometric data, showed the major separation to be between Africans and Australians on one side and Europeans, Asians and Americans on the other. Climate could be a contributing factor to the observed differences in skull and anthropometric measurements. Howells' data showed high correlations with several climatic indicators. Carrying out the phylogenetic analysis after elimination by linear regression of the effects of climate has resolved to a great extent the discrepancy between anthropometric and gene frequency data.
人体测量数据和基因频率这两类数据可用于重建人类进化历程。以往基于基因频率重建种族分化历史的研究表明,人类群体之间的主要分化是一方为非洲人和欧洲人,另一方为澳大利亚、东亚和美洲的人群。豪威尔斯(1973b)基于对17个古代群体颅骨测量所做的类似尝试,与早期人体测量数据一致,表明主要分化是一方为非洲人和澳大利亚人,另一方为欧洲人、亚洲人和美洲人。气候可能是观察到的颅骨和人体测量差异的一个促成因素。豪威尔斯的数据与多个气候指标显示出高度相关性。通过线性回归消除气候影响后进行系统发育分析,在很大程度上解决了人体测量数据和基因频率数据之间的差异。