Barker Graeme, Barton Huw, Bird Michael, Daly Patrick, Datan Ipoi, Dykes Alan, Farr Lucy, Gilbertson David, Harrisson Barbara, Hunt Chris, Higham Tom, Kealhofer Lisa, Krigbaum John, Lewis Helen, McLaren Sue, Paz Victor, Pike Alistair, Piper Phil, Pyatt Brian, Rabett Ryan, Reynolds Tim, Rose Jim, Rushworth Garry, Stephens Mark, Stringer Chris, Thompson Jill, Turney Chris
McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3ER, UK.
J Hum Evol. 2007 Mar;52(3):243-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.08.011. Epub 2006 Oct 1.
Recent research in Europe, Africa, and Southeast Asia suggests that we can no longer assume a direct and exclusive link between anatomically modern humans and behavioral modernity (the 'human revolution'), and assume that the presence of either one implies the presence of the other: discussions of the emergence of cultural complexity have to proceed with greater scrutiny of the evidence on a site-by-site basis to establish secure associations between the archaeology present there and the hominins who created it. This paper presents one such case study: Niah Cave in Sarawak on the island of Borneo, famous for the discovery in 1958 in the West Mouth of the Great Cave of a modern human skull, the 'Deep Skull,' controversially associated with radiocarbon dates of ca. 40,000 years before the present. A new chronostratigraphy has been developed through a re-investigation of the lithostratigraphy left by the earlier excavations, AMS-dating using three different comparative pre-treatments including ABOX of charcoal, and U-series using the Diffusion-Absorption model applied to fragments of bones from the Deep Skull itself. Stratigraphic reasons for earlier uncertainties about the antiquity of the skull are examined, and it is shown not to be an 'intrusive' artifact. It was probably excavated from fluvial-pond-desiccation deposits that accumulated episodically in a shallow basin immediately behind the cave entrance lip, in a climate that ranged from times of comparative aridity with complete desiccation, to episodes of greater surface wetness, changes attributed to regional climatic fluctuations. Vegetation outside the cave varied significantly over time, including wet lowland forest, montane forest, savannah, and grassland. The new dates and the lithostratigraphy relate the Deep Skull to evidence of episodes of human activity that range in date from ca. 46,000 to ca. 34,000 years ago. Initial investigations of sediment scorching, pollen, palynomorphs, phytoliths, plant macrofossils, and starch grains recovered from existing exposures, and of vertebrates from the current and the earlier excavations, suggest that human foraging during these times was marked by habitat-tailored hunting technologies, the collection and processing of toxic plants for consumption, and, perhaps, the use of fire at some forest-edges. The Niah evidence demonstrates the sophisticated nature of the subsistence behavior developed by modern humans to exploit the tropical environments that they encountered in Southeast Asia, including rainforest.
欧洲、非洲和东南亚的近期研究表明,我们不能再假定解剖学意义上的现代人类与行为现代性(“人类革命”)之间存在直接且唯一的联系,并认为其中一方的存在意味着另一方的存在:关于文化复杂性出现的讨论必须更加仔细地逐遗址审视证据,以确定当地现存考古学与创造它的古人类之间的可靠关联。本文介绍了这样一个案例研究:婆罗洲岛上砂拉越的尼亚洞,它因1958年在大洞西洞口发现一个现代人类头骨“深度头骨”而闻名,该头骨与约距今40000年的放射性碳年代测定结果存在争议性关联。通过对早期发掘留下的岩石地层学进行重新调查,开发了一种新的年代地层学,使用包括木炭的ABOX在内的三种不同比较预处理方法进行加速器质谱测年,并对深度头骨本身的骨头碎片应用扩散 - 吸收模型进行铀系测年。研究了早期对头骨年代存在不确定性的地层学原因,并表明它不是一件“侵入性”文物。它可能是从河流 - 池塘 - 干涸沉积物中挖掘出来的,这些沉积物间歇性地堆积在洞穴入口唇后方的一个浅盆地中,当时的气候从相对干旱且完全干涸的时期,到地表湿度更大的时期,这些变化归因于区域气候波动。洞穴外的植被随时间发生了显著变化,包括湿润的低地森林、山地森林、稀树草原和草原。新的年代测定和岩石地层学将深度头骨与约距今46000年至约34000年前的人类活动证据联系起来。对从现有暴露层中回收的沉积物灼烧、花粉、孢粉形态、植硅体、植物大化石和淀粉粒,以及对当前和早期发掘中的脊椎动物进行的初步调查表明,这些时期的人类觅食特点是采用适应栖息地狩猎技术、采集和加工有毒植物以供食用,或许还在一些森林边缘使用了火。尼亚洞的证据证明了现代人类为利用他们在东南亚遇到的热带环境(包括雨林)而发展出的复杂生存行为。