Suppr超能文献

减少临床决策中的确认性偏差。

Reducing confirmation bias in clinical decision-making.

作者信息

Eli I

机构信息

Department of Occlusion and Behavioral Sciences, Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.

出版信息

J Dent Educ. 1996 Oct;60(10):831-5.

PMID:8892508
Abstract

Schematic, category-based thinking is a common approach to reduce uncertainty. Once the stimulus in question is categorized under a scheme, there is a tendency to look for features that fit the scheme. We have a tendency toward "positive testing" that is, to test instances we think will fit our hypothesis, paying less attention to those that will not (confirmation bias). Schematic, category-based thinking interferes with the process of decision-making in general and in medicine and dentistry in particular. To reduce schematic thinking and to avoid confirmation bias, one must acknowledge their existence. It is the task of dental educators to open the existing schemes and encourage broad, even controversial thinking that will focus on more than one hypothesis.

摘要

基于模式的、类别化的思维是一种减少不确定性的常见方法。一旦相关刺激被归入某一模式,人们就会倾向于寻找符合该模式的特征。我们有“正向检验”的倾向,即检验那些我们认为符合我们假设的实例,而较少关注那些不符合的实例(确认偏差)。基于模式的、类别化的思维总体上会干扰决策过程,在医学和牙科领域尤其如此。为了减少模式化思维并避免确认偏差,人们必须承认它们的存在。牙科教育工作者的任务是打破现有的模式,鼓励广泛的、甚至有争议的思维,这种思维将关注不止一个假设。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验