Roelvink P W, Kovesdi I, Wickham T J
GenVec, Inc., Rockville, Maryland 20852, USA.
J Virol. 1996 Nov;70(11):7614-21. doi: 10.1128/JVI.70.11.7614-7621.1996.
We have analyzed the binding of adenovirus (Ad) serotypes from subgroups B, C, and D through fiber-virus and fiber-fiber cross-competition experiments. Since viruses in these distinct subgroups display markedly different tropisms, it was unexpected that the subgroup C viruses Ad2 and 5 and the subgroup D virus Ad9 cross-competed for the same cellular fiber receptor. The subgroup B serotype Ad3 recognized a receptor distinct from the Ad2, 5, and 9 fiber receptor. However, despite sharing the same fiber receptor, Ad2 and Ad9 displayed markedly different binding characteristics that appeared to result from direct Ad9 binding to cells via alpha(v)-integrins. Unlike Ad2, Ad9 binding to many cell lines was not abrogated by competition with the fiber 9 knob (F9K). Ad9 binding to fiber receptor-deficient cells was blocked by a monoclonal antibody to alpha(v)-integrins. In contrast, Ad9 binding to alpha(v)-deficient cells that express fiber receptor was blocked by F9K. Transfection of an alpha(v)-integrin-deficient cell line with a plasmid that expresses alpha(v)beta5 resulted in Ad9 binding that was not significantly blocked by F9K but was blocked with a combination of F9K and penton base. These results imply that the shorter length of fiber 9 (11 nm) relative to fiber 2 (37 nm) permits fiber-independent binding of Ad9 penton base to alpha(v)-integrins. The difference in fiber length may explain the different binding characteristics and tissue tropisms of each virus despite both utilizing the same fiber and penton base receptors.
我们通过纤维-病毒和纤维-纤维交叉竞争实验,分析了B、C和D亚组腺病毒(Ad)血清型的结合情况。由于这些不同亚组中的病毒表现出明显不同的嗜性,所以C亚组病毒Ad2和5以及D亚组病毒Ad9竟会竞争同一细胞纤维受体,这是出乎意料的。B亚组血清型Ad3识别的受体不同于Ad2、5和9的纤维受体。然而,尽管Ad2和Ad9共享相同的纤维受体,但它们表现出明显不同的结合特性,这似乎是由于Ad9通过α(v)整合素直接与细胞结合所致。与Ad2不同,Ad9与许多细胞系的结合不会因与纤维9钮(F9K)竞争而被消除。Ad9与纤维受体缺陷细胞的结合被抗α(v)整合素的单克隆抗体阻断。相反,Ad9与表达纤维受体的α(v)缺陷细胞的结合被F9K阻断。用表达α(v)β5的质粒转染α(v)整合素缺陷细胞系,导致Ad9的结合不会被F9K显著阻断,但会被F9K和五邻体基座的组合阻断。这些结果表明,相对于纤维2(37 nm),纤维9(11 nm)的较短长度使得Ad9五邻体基座能够独立于纤维与α(v)整合素结合。纤维长度的差异可能解释了尽管两种病毒都利用相同的纤维和五邻体基座受体,但它们具有不同的结合特性和组织嗜性。