Fujitani R M, Murray S P
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Wilford Hall Medical Center, Lackland AFB, TX, USA.
Semin Vasc Surg. 1996 Sep;9(3):198-217.
The availability of newer treatment alternatives for patients with renovascular disease has resulted in many patients being referred for surgical intervention in a delayed fashion. As a result of these changes in the type of patients being referred to surgery with more advanced renovascular hypertension and renal excretory dysfunction, vascular surgeons need to be well versed in the variety of surgical renal revascularization techniques. Each of the procedures has its own advocates, but many of these techniques are not applicable in all patients. Familiarity with the various techniques allows the surgeon to have a choice in the method of renal revascularization appropriate for a given clinical situation. Ultimately, the efficacy of any interventional procedure must be considered along with its associated morbidity, mortality, and long-term clinical outcome. All become important factors when considering the optimal primary surgical procedure to treat the patient with renovascular hypertension or renal excretory dysfunction.
对于患有肾血管疾病的患者而言,新型治疗方案的出现导致许多患者接受外科干预的时间被推迟。由于转诊至外科手术的患者类型发生了这些变化,出现了更多晚期肾血管性高血压和肾排泄功能障碍患者,血管外科医生需要精通各种外科肾血管重建技术。每种手术都有其支持者,但其中许多技术并非适用于所有患者。熟悉各种技术可使外科医生能够针对特定临床情况选择合适的肾血管重建方法。最终,在考虑任何介入手术的疗效时,必须同时考虑其相关的发病率、死亡率和长期临床结果。在考虑治疗肾血管性高血压或肾排泄功能障碍患者的最佳初次外科手术时,所有这些都成为重要因素。