• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定性研究工具中沟通技巧的三角互证法

Triangulation of communication skills in qualitative research instruments.

作者信息

Begley C M

机构信息

Faculty of Nursing, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 1996 Oct;24(4):688-93. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.02446.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.02446.x
PMID:8894885
Abstract

Triangulation is a credible and useful method of conducting research which can result in an increase in both quality and quantity of data gathered. The five documented types of triangulation (data, investigator, theoretical, methodological, unit of analysis) do not completely answer all the needs of nurse researchers, particularly in the field of qualitative research. Using more than one method of data collection from within the same research tradition (within-method triangulation) is an accepted and effective technique. Extending the concept of triangulation to include the development of research tools leads to the proposal that the conscious use of two or three types of communication within each qualitative research instrument would improve its effectiveness over a tool which used only one type. This application of 'triangulation of communication skills' is considered within each of the major qualitative research tools, and the benefits outlined. The implications for nursing research and nurse researchers of consciously using non-verbal cues to supplement verbal information are described. It is suggested that using triangulation of communication skills in this way may improve the validity of data obtained and, if clearly documented, increase the credibility of the findings. In particular, when conducting qualitative interviews, the expert use of triangulation of communication skills will enhance the quality and quantity of data gathered. To this end, novice researchers need education and practice in using communication skills to best effect, in order to ensure the validity and completeness of their findings.

摘要

三角互证法是一种可靠且有用的研究方法,它能够增加所收集数据的质量和数量。已记录的五种三角互证法类型(数据、研究者、理论、方法、分析单位)并不能完全满足护理研究人员的所有需求,尤其是在定性研究领域。在同一研究传统内使用多种数据收集方法(方法内三角互证法)是一种被认可且有效的技术。将三角互证法的概念扩展到包括研究工具的开发,从而提出在每个定性研究工具中自觉使用两三种沟通方式会比仅使用一种沟通方式的工具更有效。本文在每种主要的定性研究工具中都考虑了“沟通技巧三角互证法”的这种应用,并概述了其益处。描述了自觉使用非语言线索来补充语言信息对护理研究和护理研究人员的影响。建议以这种方式使用沟通技巧三角互证法可能会提高所获数据的效度,并且如果记录清晰,会增加研究结果的可信度。特别是在进行定性访谈时,专家级地运用沟通技巧三角互证法将提高所收集数据的质量和数量。为此,新手研究人员需要接受教育并练习如何最佳地运用沟通技巧,以确保其研究结果的效度和完整性。

相似文献

1
Triangulation of communication skills in qualitative research instruments.定性研究工具中沟通技巧的三角互证法
J Adv Nurs. 1996 Oct;24(4):688-93. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.02446.x.
2
Using triangulation in nursing research.护理研究中三角互证法的运用
J Adv Nurs. 1996 Jul;24(1):122-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.15217.x.
3
Issues in using methodological triangulation in research.研究中使用方法三角互证法的相关问题。
Nurse Res. 2009;16(4):40-55. doi: 10.7748/nr2009.07.16.4.40.c7160.
4
Triangulation: a means of reconciliation in nursing research.三角互证法:护理研究中的一种调和手段。
J Adv Nurs. 1993 May;18(5):788-92. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1993.18050788.x.
5
Triangulation for the assessment of clinical nursing skills: a review of theory, use and methodology.三角评估法在临床护理技能评估中的应用:理论、应用和方法学综述。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Mar;47(3):386-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.09.004. Epub 2009 Oct 12.
6
Concept advancement: enhancing inductive validity.概念推进:提高归纳有效性。
Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2003 Spring;17(1):19-30. doi: 10.1891/rtnp.17.1.19.53168.
7
Literature review: considerations in undertaking focus group research with culturally and linguistically diverse groups.文献综述:针对文化和语言背景各异群体开展焦点小组研究的注意事项
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Jun;16(6):1000-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01760.x.
8
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
9
Preparing and conducting interviews to collect data.准备并进行访谈以收集数据。
Nurse Res. 2013 May;20(5):28-32. doi: 10.7748/nr2013.05.20.5.28.e327.
10
A critical appraisal of the role of triangulation in nursing research.对三角互证法在护理研究中作用的批判性评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 1998 Feb-Apr;35(1-2):23-31. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7489(98)00014-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Unmet Needs of Endometriosis Patients with Respect to Health Care Services: A Qualitative Study Using a Patient Training Workshop.子宫内膜异位症患者在医疗服务方面未满足的需求:一项使用患者培训工作坊的定性研究
J Clin Med. 2025 May 16;14(10):3504. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103504.
2
Factors influencing decision-making for caesarean section in Sweden - a qualitative study.影响瑞典剖宫产决策的因素——一项定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Sep 17;18(1):377. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2007-7.
3
Fathers' experiences of care when their partners suffer from peripartum cardiomyopathy: a qualitative interview study.
父亲在伴侣患围产期心肌病时的护理体验:一项定性访谈研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Aug 13;18(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1968-x.
4
Online Health-Information Seeking Among Older Populations: Family Influences and the Role of the Medical Professional.老年人在线健康信息搜索:家庭影响和医疗专业人员的作用。
Health Commun. 2019 Jul;34(8):859-871. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2018.1439265. Epub 2018 Feb 23.