Latowsky M
Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Psychoactive Drugs. 1996 Jul-Sep;28(3):251-7. doi: 10.1080/02791072.1996.10472486.
Changing paradigms of health care and increasing knowledge of opioid addiction continue to influence the attitudes of the health profession toward methadone maintenance treatment (MMT). This approach has again reached the forefront of attention because of its significant role in reducing HIV transmission associated with intravenous drug use. In spite of the well-documented benefits of MMT, patients continue to detoxify from methadone for a variety of reasons both overt and covert. Variable outcomes and generally poor long-term abstinence rates results. At present uncertainty still exists surrounding who should attempt detoxification, when or how this should be done, or whether in fact detoxification should be attempted at all. This article describes and examines factors that are positively and negatively associated with detoxification outcome. Evidence for the interrelationship of two notably significant determinants, affective states and protracted withdrawal, are presented and discussed as they relate to theories of relapse and outcome.
医疗保健模式的转变以及对阿片类药物成瘾认识的不断增加,持续影响着医疗行业对美沙酮维持治疗(MMT)的态度。由于其在减少与静脉注射吸毒相关的艾滋病毒传播方面的重要作用,这种方法再次成为关注的焦点。尽管MMT的益处有充分记录,但患者仍因各种明显和潜在的原因停止使用美沙酮。这导致了结果的多样性和总体较差的长期戒断率。目前,关于谁应该尝试戒毒、何时以及如何进行戒毒,或者实际上是否应该尝试戒毒,仍然存在不确定性。本文描述并研究了与戒毒结果呈正相关和负相关的因素。阐述并讨论了两个特别重要的决定因素——情感状态和稽延性戒断之间的相互关系,因为它们与复发理论和结果有关。