• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过³²P后标记法测定有机木材防腐废料提取物在小鼠组织中诱导的DNA损伤。

DNA damage induced in mouse tissues by organic wood preserving waste extracts as assayed by 32P-postlabeling.

作者信息

Randerath E, Zhou G D, Donnelly K C, Safe S H, Randerath K

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

出版信息

Arch Toxicol. 1996;70(11):683-95. doi: 10.1007/s002040050329.

DOI:10.1007/s002040050329
PMID:8896714
Abstract

Numerous wood preserving waste (WPW) sites in the United States pose genotoxic hazards. WPWs consist of complex mixtures containing toxic, including genotoxic, compounds which are derived from the preservatives coal tar creosote and pentachlorophenol (PCP) and other polychlorinated aromatics. The genotoxicity of WPW extracts, which has not been tested in mammals, cannot be evaluated on the basis of data for individual components because of possible compound interactions. Therefore, whole extracts need to be assayed. 32P-postlabeling represents a powerful tool to determine DNA adduct formation by complex genotoxic mixtures, such as cigarette smoke, diesel exhaust, and coke oven and foundry emissions in experimental animals and humans. In the present study, a mouse bioassay was used in combination with 32P-postlabeling to determine DNA adduct formation induced by hexane/acetone extracts of two samples from a WPW site. Female ICR mice were treated dermally with extract corresponding to 3 mg residue or vehicle control once per day for 2 days and killed 24 h later. Skin, lung, liver, kidney, and heart DNA preparations were assayed by nuclease P1-enhanced postlabeling. Adduct profiles were tissue-specific and displayed a multitude of non-polar DNA adducts with levels amounting to one adduct in 1.6 x 10(6) DNA nucleotides in skin (both extracts) and one adduct in 3.2 x 10(7) or 1.2 x 10(7) DNA nucleotides in liver (extract 1 or extract 2). Based on their chromatographic properties, these adducts appeared largely derived from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) present in the extracts. One of the major adducts was identified as the 32P-labeled derivative of the reaction product of 7 beta, 8 alpha-dihydroxy-9 alpha, 10 alpha-epoxy-7, 8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo[a]pyrene (BPDE I) with N2 of deoxyguanosine. Total non-polar DNA adduct levels were highest in skin and lung, amounting to 17.4 and 24.0% of the skin values for extracts 1 and 2, respectively, in lung while the corresponding levels in liver were 5.0 and 12.6%. These results were in accord with the carcinogenic potencies of PAHs in these organs. Extract 2 induced higher adduct levels in internal organs, although its PAH concentrations were lower than those of extract 1, i.e. lung, liver, kidney, and heart had 1.4, 2.5, 1.9, and 1.7 times higher total adduct levels and 1.6, 3.3, 1.6, and 1.9 times higher benzo[a]pyrene adduct levels. With the exception of total adducts in lung, the differences between the two extracts were all significant, suggestive of compound interactions. The benzo[a]pyrene adduct levels in the five tissues correlated linearly with total adduct levels and thus represented a surrogate for the latter. Overall, the results suggest that DNA adducts in mouse tissues, as analyzed by 32P-postlabeling, are suitable biomarkers and dosimeters of the genotoxicity of WPW extracts.

摘要

美国众多的木材防腐废料(WPW)场地存在基因毒性危害。WPW由复杂混合物构成,其中含有包括基因毒性化合物在内的有毒化合物,这些化合物源自防腐剂煤焦油杂酚油和五氯苯酚(PCP)以及其他多氯芳烃。由于可能存在化合物间的相互作用,WPW提取物的基因毒性尚未在哺乳动物中进行测试,因此无法根据单个成分的数据来评估。所以,需要对整个提取物进行检测。32P后标记法是一种强大的工具,可用于确定复杂基因毒性混合物(如香烟烟雾、柴油机废气以及焦炉和铸造厂排放物)在实验动物和人类中诱导的DNA加合物形成情况。在本研究中,将小鼠生物测定法与32P后标记法结合使用,以确定来自一个WPW场地的两个样品的己烷/丙酮提取物诱导的DNA加合物形成情况。雌性ICR小鼠每天经皮给予相当于3毫克残留物的提取物或赋形剂对照,连续2天,24小时后处死。通过核酸酶P1增强后标记法检测皮肤、肺、肝、肾和心脏的DNA制剂。加合物图谱具有组织特异性,显示出多种非极性DNA加合物,皮肤(两种提取物)中加合物水平相当于每1.6×10⁶个DNA核苷酸中有一个加合物,肝脏(提取物1或提取物2)中加合物水平相当于每3.2×10⁷或1.2×10⁷个DNA核苷酸中有一个加合物。根据其色谱特性,这些加合物似乎主要源自提取物中存在的多环芳烃(PAH)。其中一种主要加合物被鉴定为7β,8α - 二羟基 - 9α,10α - 环氧 - 7,8,9,10 - 四氢苯并[a]芘(BPDE I)与脱氧鸟苷的N²反应产物的32P标记衍生物。非极性DNA加合物总水平在皮肤和肺中最高,在肺中提取物1和提取物2分别相当于皮肤值的17.4%和24.0%,而肝脏中的相应水平分别为5.0%和12.6%。这些结果与PAH在这些器官中的致癌潜能一致。提取物2在内脏中诱导的加合物水平更高,尽管其PAH浓度低于提取物1,即肺、肝、肾和心脏中的总加合物水平分别高1.4、2.5、1.9和1.7倍,苯并[a]芘加合物水平分别高1.6、3.3、1.6和1.9倍。除了肺中的总加合物外,两种提取物之间的差异均具有显著性,提示存在化合物间的相互作用。五个组织中的苯并[a]芘加合物水平与总加合物水平呈线性相关,因此可作为后者的替代指标。总体而言,结果表明,通过32P后标记法分析的小鼠组织中的DNA加合物是WPW提取物基因毒性的合适生物标志物和剂量计。

相似文献

1
DNA damage induced in mouse tissues by organic wood preserving waste extracts as assayed by 32P-postlabeling.通过³²P后标记法测定有机木材防腐废料提取物在小鼠组织中诱导的DNA损伤。
Arch Toxicol. 1996;70(11):683-95. doi: 10.1007/s002040050329.
2
Comparative 32P-postlabeling analysis of exogenous and endogenous DNA adducts in mouse skin exposed to a wood-preserving waste extract, a complex mixture of polycyclic and polychlorinated chemicals.
Environ Mol Mutagen. 1997;29(4):372-8.
3
32P-postlabeling and HPLC separation of DNA adducts formed by diesel exhaust extracts in vitro and in mouse skin and lung after topical treatment.用32P后标记法及高效液相色谱法分离柴油废气提取物在体外以及经局部处理后在小鼠皮肤和肺中形成的DNA加合物。
Carcinogenesis. 1995 Sep;16(9):2083-9. doi: 10.1093/carcin/16.9.2083.
4
Comparison of 32P-postlabeling and HPLC-FD analysis of DNA adducts in rats acutely exposed to benzo(a)pyrene.急性暴露于苯并(a)芘的大鼠中DNA加合物的32P后标记法与高效液相色谱-荧光检测分析法的比较
Chem Biol Interact. 1997 Apr 18;104(1):41-54. doi: 10.1016/s0009-2797(97)03765-4.
5
Dose-related differences in DNA adduct levels in rodent tissues following skin application of complex mixtures from air pollution sources.空气污染源复杂混合物经皮肤涂抹后,啮齿动物组织中DNA加合物水平的剂量相关差异。
Carcinogenesis. 1990 Jan;11(1):63-8. doi: 10.1093/carcin/11.1.63.
6
DNA adduct formation in mammalian cell cultures by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) and nitro-PAH in coke oven emission extract.焦炉排放物提取物中多环芳烃(PAH)和硝基多环芳烃在哺乳动物细胞培养物中形成DNA加合物的情况。
Mutat Res. 1998 Nov 9;419(1-3):91-105. doi: 10.1016/s1383-5718(98)00127-2.
7
Comparison of immunoaffinity chromatography enrichment and nuclease P1 procedures for 32P-postlabelling analysis of PAH-DNA adducts.免疫亲和色谱富集法与核酸酶P1法用于多环芳烃-DNA加合物32P后标记分析的比较
Chem Biol Interact. 1998 Mar 12;110(1-2):85-102. doi: 10.1016/s0009-2797(98)00003-9.
8
DNA damage induced by wood preserving waste extracts in vitro without metabolic activation, as assayed by 32P-postlabeling.
Cancer Lett. 1994 Aug 15;83(1-2):123-8. doi: 10.1016/0304-3835(94)90308-5.
9
Genotoxicity of coke-oven and urban air particulate matter in in vitro acellular assays coupled with 32P-postlabeling and HPLC analysis of DNA adducts.焦炉和城市空气中颗粒物在体外无细胞试验中的遗传毒性,结合DNA加合物的32P后标记和高效液相色谱分析
Mutat Res. 1998 May 11;414(1-3):77-94. doi: 10.1016/s1383-5718(98)00040-0.
10
Genotoxicity of organic extracts of house dust from Shanxi, China.中国山西室内灰尘有机提取物的遗传毒性。
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2007 Dec;70(24):2080-8. doi: 10.1080/15287390701601376.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex-dependent differences in behavioral and immunological responses to antibiotic and bacteriophage administration in mice.抗生素和噬菌体给药对小鼠行为和免疫反应的性别依赖性差异。
Front Immunol. 2023 May 25;14:1133358. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1133358. eCollection 2023.
2
Attenuation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH)-Mediated Pulmonary DNA Adducts and Cytochrome P450 (CYP)1B1 by Dietary Antioxidants, Omega-3 Fatty Acids, in Mice.膳食抗氧化剂、ω-3脂肪酸对小鼠体内多环芳烃(PAH)介导的肺DNA加合物和细胞色素P450(CYP)1B1的抑制作用
Antioxidants (Basel). 2022 Jan 5;11(1):119. doi: 10.3390/antiox11010119.
3
Effects of dietary fish oil on the depletion of carcinogenic PAH-DNA adduct levels in the liver of B6C3F1 mouse.
膳食鱼油对 B6C3F1 小鼠肝脏中致癌性多环芳烃-DNA 加合物水平耗竭的影响。
PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026589. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
4
Role of retinoic acid in the modulation of benzo(a)pyrene-DNA adducts in human hepatoma cells: implications for cancer prevention.视黄酸在调节人肝癌细胞中苯并(a)芘-DNA 加合物中的作用:对癌症预防的意义。
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2010 Dec 15;249(3):224-30. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2010.09.019. Epub 2010 Oct 1.