• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预先指示在初级保健中的重要性。

The importance of advance directives in primary care.

作者信息

Arenson C A, Novielli K D, Chambers C V, Perkel R L

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Prim Care. 1996 Mar;23(1):67-82. doi: 10.1016/s0095-4543(05)70261-x.

DOI:10.1016/s0095-4543(05)70261-x
PMID:8900507
Abstract

The advance directive has been acknowledged widely by patients and physicians as a desirable tool to promote patient autonomy at the end of life. Rates of completion of advance directives, however, remain low among all segments of the population. Significant patient and physician barriers to completion of advance directives are considered. Legal and ethical principles of advance directives, as well as some practical means of overcoming barriers to these important discussions, are reviewed.

摘要

预先指示已被患者和医生广泛认可为一种在生命末期促进患者自主性的理想工具。然而,在所有人群中,预先指示的完成率仍然很低。本文考虑了患者和医生在完成预先指示方面存在的重大障碍。回顾了预先指示的法律和伦理原则,以及克服这些重要讨论障碍的一些实际方法。

相似文献

1
The importance of advance directives in primary care.预先指示在初级保健中的重要性。
Prim Care. 1996 Mar;23(1):67-82. doi: 10.1016/s0095-4543(05)70261-x.
2
Adopting Advance Directives Reinforces Patient Participation in End-of-Life Care Discussion.采用预先指示加强患者对临终关怀讨论的参与。
Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Apr;48(2):753-8. doi: 10.4143/crt.2015.281. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
3
Implementation of advance directives. For physicians, a legal dilemma becomes an ethical imperative.
Arch Intern Med. 1992 May;152(5):925-9. doi: 10.1001/archinte.152.5.925.
4
The discussion about advance directives. Patient and physician opinions regarding when and how it should be conducted. End of Life Study Group.关于预立医疗指示的讨论。患者和医生对于何时以及如何进行预立医疗指示的看法。临终研究小组。
Arch Intern Med. 1995 May 22;155(10):1025-30. doi: 10.1001/archinte.155.10.1025.
5
[Acceptance and validation of advanced directives--ethical and clinical considerations].[预立医疗指示的接受与验证——伦理与临床考量]
Wien Med Wochenschr. 1997;147(6):121-4.
6
[Values anamnesis: a narrative approach to determining and interpreting advance directives].[病史记录的价值:一种确定和解读预立医疗指示的叙事方法]
Wien Med Wochenschr. 1997;147(6):125-9.
7
Perspectives. Advance directives get a cautious welcome.
Faulkner Grays Med Health. 1991 Dec 2;45(46):suppl 4 p..
8
Comparison of patients' and health care professionals' attitudes towards advance directives.患者与医疗保健专业人员对预立医疗指示的态度比较。
J Med Ethics. 1998 Oct;24(5):328-35. doi: 10.1136/jme.24.5.328.
9
Advance directives in the primary care setting.初级保健环境中的预先医疗指示。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2004 Jul 15;116(13):417-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03040928.
10
End of life and the advance directive.生命终末期与预立医疗指示。
Tenn Med. 2010 Feb;103(2):19-26.

引用本文的文献

1
Advance directives: survey of primary care patients.预立医疗指示:初级保健患者调查
Can Fam Physician. 2015 Apr;61(4):353-6.
2
Doctors' authoritarianism in end-of-life treatment decisions. A comparison between Russia, Sweden and Germany.医生在临终治疗决策中的专制主义。俄罗斯、瑞典和德国之间的比较。
J Med Ethics. 2001 Jun;27(3):186-91. doi: 10.1136/jme.27.3.186.