Total atrioventricular cardiac transplantation preserves atrial systole and ventricular diastolic filling.

BACKGROUND

Total orthotopic heart transplantation was recently introduced into clinical practice as an alternative technique for orthotopic cardiac transplantation. Total cardiac transplantation uses separate bicaval and left and right pulmonary anastomoses, whereas the standard technique of cardiac transplantation uses atrioplasty. Because the anatomic differences between total and standard orthotopic heart transplantation occur at the atrial level, this study compares atrial systolic function and biventricular filling (dV/dt) between the standard and total transplantation techniques.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Forty-eight mongrel canines (23 to 31 kg) were used for 12 total and 12 standard orthotopic cardiac transplantations. Right and left ventricular (RV/LV) function and AV synchrony were analyzed with micromanometry, sonomicrometry, ultrasonic flow meters, and intraoperative echocardiography. Results are expressed as mean +/- SEM (ANOVA, paired and unpaired t tests, and chi 2 test). There were no significant differences in baseline function (pretransplantation), bypass times, and cardiac ischemic times between the two groups. Posttransplantation sinus rhythm was preserved in all total (P < 0025) and in only one standard transplantation recipient (all required atrial diastole pacing). Significant decreases in RV/LV dV/dt from 113 +/- 13 and 123 +/- 14 mL/s to 69 +/- 6 and 85 +/- 10 mL/s after transplantation were measured in the standard group. No significant changes occurred in the total group after transplantation with respect to RV/LV diastolic filling. After transplantation, left atrial contractility and relaxation (-dP/dt) decreased significantly in the standard group by 43% and 70%, respectively, whereas in the total transplantation group, there were no observed changes in left atrial contractility and-dP/dt. A significant increase in the septum to RV free wall dimension in the standard group suggests altered geometry.

CONCLUSIONS

Total AV transplantation is a feasible alternative to standard cardiac transplantation and conserves both normal sinus rhythm and synchronized beating of the atria and ventricles. Ischemic and bypass times are comparable in patients undergoing either method. These data suggest that RV/LV diastolic function and geometry and atrial systole are better preserved in the total AV transplantation technique.