Daee S, Wilding J M
Br J Psychol. 1977 Aug;68(3):335-49. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1977.tb01598.x.
Seven experiments are described investigating the effect of high intensity white noise during the visual presentation of words on a number of short-term memory tasks. The findings were: 1. In a free recall task recall of items decreased at the highest intensity used (85 dB) compared with a quiet and a 75 dB condition. 2. In free recall, recall by category decreased and recall in the original sequence increased in the 75 dB compared with the other two conditions. 3. Recall of the position of words in the list increased as noise intensity increased, but only when the learning of position was incidental, not when it was intentional. It is inferred that the effect is due to direction of attention or change in the learning strategy. 4. Recall of the original sequence (as shown by the ability to give in response to a word from a list the word which had followed it in the original list) was superior in the 75 dB compared with the other two conditions, but only when recall of the second word was required, not when it had to be recognized among all the items from the original list. It is argued that this can be explained if noise intensity affects the strength of traces and hence the interconnexions established between them, on which retrieval depends. The results for position learning are compatible with the theories of Hockey & Hamilton (1970) or Dornic (1973), but the results for sequence learning cannot be explained by either of these theories. A final experiment confirmed a prediction from the above theory that when recalling the original sequence, omissions (recalling no word) will decrease and transpositions (giving the wrong word) will increase as noise level increases.
本文描述了七项实验,研究在单词视觉呈现过程中高强度白噪声对一系列短期记忆任务的影响。研究结果如下:1. 在自由回忆任务中,与安静条件和75分贝条件相比,在最高强度(85分贝)下项目的回忆量减少。2. 在自由回忆中,与其他两种条件相比,在75分贝条件下按类别回忆减少,按原始顺序回忆增加。3. 随着噪声强度增加,单词在列表中位置的回忆量增加,但仅当位置学习是附带的而非有意的时才会如此。据推断,这种影响是由于注意力的方向或学习策略的改变。4. 与其他两种条件相比,在75分贝条件下原始顺序的回忆(如通过能够根据列表中的一个单词给出原始列表中跟随它的单词来体现)更好,但仅当需要回忆第二个单词时如此,而非当必须从原始列表的所有项目中识别它时。有人认为,如果噪声强度影响痕迹的强度,从而影响它们之间建立的相互联系(而检索依赖于此),那么这一点可以得到解释。位置学习的结果与霍基和汉密尔顿(1970年)或多尼克(1973年)的理论相符,但顺序学习的结果无法用这两种理论中的任何一种来解释。最后一项实验证实了上述理论的一个预测,即当回忆原始顺序时,随着噪声水平增加,遗漏(不回忆任何单词)将减少,换位(给出错误单词)将增加。