Olesen J, Rasmussen B K
Department of Neurology, Glostrup Hospital, Denmark.
Cephalalgia. 1996 Oct;16(6):407-11. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1996.1606407.x.
The classification of the International Headache Society (IHS) published in 1988 has been positively received throughout the world. However, the classification of headaches occurring daily or almost daily has been criticized repeatedly. This criticisim is discussed in the present review. It is possible to classify virtually all chronic headache patients using the IHS Classification and there seems to be more need for emphasizing a correct application of the classification than for a revision in this regard. The entity of transformed migraine is disputed and so is the existence of hemicrania continua. Neither of these syndromes has been adequately defined nor studied. Chronic daily headache of sudden onset (new persistent daily headache) is not adequately classified at present and should be included as a separate entity in the next edition of the IHS Classification. In a future revision it should also be possible to classify drug-related headache simply on the basis of drug consumption and without mandatory demands for withdrawal. Better longitudinal studies of patients with chronic daily headache are necessary to evaluate finally whether a revision of the classification of these headache syndromes is necessary. Eventually the ongoing discovery of migraine genes is likely to change radically the classification of migraine.
1988年出版的国际头痛协会(IHS)分类在全球受到了积极认可。然而,对每日或几乎每日发作的头痛分类一直屡遭批评。本综述将探讨这一批评。使用IHS分类几乎可以对所有慢性头痛患者进行分类,在这方面似乎更需要强调正确应用该分类,而非进行修订。转化型偏头痛的实体存在争议,持续性偏侧头痛的存在也存在争议。这两种综合征均未得到充分定义和研究。目前,突发的慢性每日头痛(新的持续性每日头痛)分类尚不充分,应在下一版IHS分类中作为一个单独的实体纳入。在未来的修订中,也应该能够仅根据药物使用情况对药物相关性头痛进行分类,而无需强制要求停药。需要对慢性每日头痛患者进行更好的纵向研究,以最终评估是否有必要对这些头痛综合征的分类进行修订。最终,正在进行的偏头痛基因发现可能会从根本上改变偏头痛的分类。