Seilheimer T A, Doyal G T
St. Clair County Community Mental Health Services, Port Huron, Michigan 48060, USA.
Community Ment Health J. 1996 Dec;32(6):549-59. doi: 10.1007/BF02251065.
During clinical recovery mental health consumers express increasing interest in assuming control over their community living arrangements. Despite recent policy initiatives toward consumer empowerment in housing services and supports, few studies have explored empowerment issues, such as self-efficacy, in relation to housing satisfaction. This study explored the extent to which specific areas of support and self-efficacy predict consumer satisfaction with housing. This study also explored how different types of housing, and consumer housing preferences, also explain consumer satisfaction with housing. One-hundred twenty-five randomly selected consumers completed structured interviews. As hypothesized, hierarchical multiple predictor regression analyses revealed type of housing and self-efficacy as significant predictor variables. The total regression equation accounted for 67 percent of the explained variance in housing satisfaction. Chi-square analyses across housing groups indicated that consumers prefer less restrictive residential settings. Findings suggest that consumers prefer less restrictive housing, as such relate in part to increasing levels of self-efficacy. Further study is recommended to explore how self-efficacy may best be promoted across different clinical groups and different residential settings.
在临床康复过程中，精神健康消费者对掌控自己的社区生活安排表现出越来越浓厚的兴趣。尽管近期出台了旨在增强消费者在住房服务和支持方面权能的政策举措，但很少有研究探讨与住房满意度相关的权能问题，比如自我效能感。本研究探讨了特定支持领域和自我效能感在多大程度上能够预测消费者对住房的满意度。本研究还探讨了不同类型的住房以及消费者的住房偏好如何解释消费者对住房的满意度。125名随机挑选的消费者完成了结构化访谈。正如所假设的那样，分层多元预测回归分析显示住房类型和自我效能感是显著的预测变量。总的回归方程解释了住房满意度中67%的变异。跨住房群体的卡方分析表明，消费者更喜欢限制较少的居住环境。研究结果表明，消费者更喜欢限制较少的住房，这在一定程度上与自我效能感水平的提高有关。建议进一步开展研究，以探索如何在不同临床群体和不同居住环境中最好地提升自我效能感。
