• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

上海老年高血压硝苯地平试验(STONE)

Shanghai trial of nifedipine in the elderly (STONE).

作者信息

Gong L, Zhang W, Zhu Y, Zhu J, Kong D, Pagé V, Ghadirian P, LeLorier J, Hamet P

机构信息

Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Rui Jun Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai Second Medical University, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Hypertens. 1996 Oct;14(10):1237-45. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199610000-00013.

DOI:10.1097/00004872-199610000-00013
PMID:8906524
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of nifedipine treatment in elderly hypertensives.

METHODS

A single-blind trial was conducted under the direction of the Shanghai Institute of Hypertension in 1632 subjects aged 60-79 years alternatively allocated to either nifedipine or placebo after a 4-week placebo run-in period between 1987 and 1990 with mean follow-up of 30 months. Clinical events and risk modification were analysed in collaboration with the University of Montreal. Seventy-four patients with severe hypertension were reallocated to active nifedipine treatment after placebo run-in.

RESULTS

Cox's proportional hazards model accounting for covariates demonstrated a highly significant decrease in the probability of events: 'original treatment assignment' analysis indicated that 77 events occurred in the placebo and 32 in the nifedipine group. Similar significances were achieved with 'actual treatment' or 'changes excluded' (excluding reallocated subjects) analyses. A significant reduction in relative risk was observed for strokes and severe arrhythmia with an overall decrease from 1.0 to 0.41 (95% confidence interval 0.27-0.61).

CONCLUSION

Nifedipine treatment diminished the number of severe clinical outcomes in elderly hypertensives significantly.

摘要

目的

评估硝苯地平治疗老年高血压患者的疗效。

方法

1987年至1990年间,在上海高血压研究所指导下进行了一项单盲试验,1632名年龄在60 - 79岁的受试者在经过4周安慰剂导入期后,被交替分配至硝苯地平组或安慰剂组,平均随访30个月。与蒙特利尔大学合作分析临床事件和风险变化。74名重度高血压患者在安慰剂导入期后被重新分配至硝苯地平活性治疗组。

结果

考虑协变量的Cox比例风险模型显示事件发生概率显著降低:“原始治疗分配”分析表明,安慰剂组发生77起事件,硝苯地平组发生32起事件。“实际治疗”或“排除变化”(排除重新分配的受试者)分析也得出了类似的显著性结果。观察到中风和严重心律失常的相对风险显著降低,总体从1.0降至0.41(95%置信区间0.27 - 0.61)。

结论

硝苯地平治疗显著减少了老年高血压患者严重临床结局的数量。

相似文献

1
Shanghai trial of nifedipine in the elderly (STONE).上海老年高血压硝苯地平试验(STONE)
J Hypertens. 1996 Oct;14(10):1237-45. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199610000-00013.
2
The STONE Study (Shanghai Trial of Hypertension in the Elderly): a meeting report.
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1996 Sep;10(4):467-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00051112.
3
Antihypertensive therapy debate: contribution from the Shanghai Trial Of Nifedipine in the Elderly (STONE).
J Hypertens Suppl. 1996 Nov;14(4):S9-14. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199606234-00003.
4
[A prospective study on the effect of nifedipine of the cardiovascular complications in the elderly hypertensives].
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 1992 Oct;20(5):281-4, 323-4.
5
[STONE study and INSIGHT study: efficacy of nifedipine in the prevention of cardiovascular disease in hypertensive patients].
Drugs. 2006;66 Spec No 1:13-5. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200666991-00006.
6
Comparison of nifedipine GITS and hydrochlorothiazide in the management of elderly patients with stage I-III diastolic hypertension.硝苯地平控释片与氢氯噻嗪治疗老年Ⅰ-Ⅲ期舒张期高血压的比较。
Am J Hypertens. 1996 Jun;9(6):598-606. doi: 10.1016/0895-7061(96)00168-9.
7
Safety of long-acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers in hypertensive patients.长效二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂在高血压患者中的安全性
Am J Cardiol. 1998 Jan 15;81(2):163-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00868-0.
8
Calcium antagonists as first-line antihypertensive agents: a placebo-controlled, comparative trial of isradipine and nifedipine.钙拮抗剂作为一线抗高血压药物:一项关于伊拉地平与硝苯地平的安慰剂对照比较试验。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1990;15 Suppl 1:S70-4.
9
Quality of life and calcium channel blockade with nifedipine GITS versus amlodipine in hypertensive patients in Spain. Gastrointestinal Therapeutic System.西班牙高血压患者使用硝苯地平胃肠道治疗系统与氨氯地平进行钙通道阻滞治疗时的生活质量对比。胃肠道治疗系统
J Hypertens. 1998 Dec;16(12 Pt 1):1839-47. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199816120-00018.
10
Treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension with calcium channel blockers: a multicentre comparison of once-daily nifedipine GITS with once-daily amlodipine.钙通道阻滞剂治疗轻至中度高血压:一日一次硝苯地平控释片与一日一次氨氯地平的多中心比较
Curr Med Res Opin. 2003;19(3):226-37. doi: 10.1185/030079903125001677.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining the therapeutic potential and side effects of calcium channel blockers in mortality and morbidity of patients with stroke: A systematic review of pre-clinical and clinical studies.研究钙通道阻滞剂对中风患者死亡率和发病率的治疗潜力及副作用:临床前和临床研究的系统评价
IBRO Neurosci Rep. 2025 Jan 8;18:222-243. doi: 10.1016/j.ibneur.2025.01.002. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Chinese Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Hypertension (2024 revision).《中国高血压防治指南(2024年修订版)》
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2025 Jan 28;22(1):1-149. doi: 10.26599/1671-5411.2025.01.008.
3
Comparative efficacy of different antihypertensive drug classes for stroke prevention: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
不同类别降压药物预防卒中的比较疗效:一项随机对照试验的网状Meta分析
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 21;20(2):e0313309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313309. eCollection 2025.
4
Long-acting nifedipine in the management of essential hypertension: a review for cardiologists.长效硝苯地平在原发性高血压治疗中的应用:心血管科医生的综述
Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2024 Dec 15;14(6):396-413. doi: 10.62347/RPMZ6407. eCollection 2024.
5
2023 Guideline for the management of hypertension in the elderly population in China.《中国老年高血压管理指南(2023年版)》
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2024 Jun 28;21(6):589-630. doi: 10.26599/1671-5411.2024.06.001.
6
Hypertension in China: epidemiology and treatment initiatives.中国高血压:流行病学和治疗措施。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2023 Aug;20(8):531-545. doi: 10.1038/s41569-022-00829-z. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
7
Benefits and risks of antihypertensive medication in adults with different systolic blood pressure: A meta-analysis from the perspective of the number needed to treat.不同收缩压水平的成年患者使用抗高血压药物的获益与风险:基于治疗所需人数视角的荟萃分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 19;9:986502. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.986502. eCollection 2022.
8
Calcium channel blockers versus other classes of drugs for hypertension.钙通道阻滞剂与其他类药物治疗高血压的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 9;1(1):CD003654. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003654.pub6.
9
Calcium channel blockers versus other classes of drugs for hypertension.钙通道阻滞剂与其他降压药物的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 17;10(10):CD003654. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003654.pub5.
10
Starting Antihypertensive Drug Treatment With Combination Therapy: Controversies in Hypertension - Con Side of the Argument.开始抗高血压药物治疗联合治疗:高血压的争议-反面观点。
Hypertension. 2021 Mar 3;77(3):788-798. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.12858. Epub 2021 Feb 10.