• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长效二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂在高血压患者中的安全性

Safety of long-acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers in hypertensive patients.

作者信息

Kloner R A, Vetrovec G W, Materson B J, Levenstein M

机构信息

Heart Institute, Good Samaritan Hospital and the University of Southern California, Los Angeles 90017, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1998 Jan 15;81(2):163-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00868-0.

DOI:10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00868-0
PMID:9591899
Abstract

Issues raised recently concerning the safety of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) prompted an analysis of the occurrence of cardiovascular events and death in the Pfizer Inc. hypertension clinical trial databases for amlodipine (Norvasc) and nifedipine in the gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) formulation (Procardia XL). Prospectively defined analyses of data from comparative and noncomparative trials of amlodipine and nifedipine GITS were conducted. Outcome measures included cardiovascular and noncardiovascular deaths, and adverse cardiovascular events including new/worsened angina, myocardial infarction (MI), serious arrhythmia, stroke, congestive heart failure, and bleeding. Among all amlodipine-treated patients (n = 32,920), the incidence rates for all-cause death, MI, and new/worsened angina were 3.0, 3.3, and 1.6/1,000 patient-years of exposure, respectively. Among those in comparative trials alone (n = 4,126), the all-cause death rate was 4.1/1,000 patient-years, which was comparable to that of other non-CCB agents and significantly less than that of other CCBs (23.8/1,000 patient-years, p = 0.015), although the difference in rates represents only 2 deaths. Among all nifedipine-GITS-treated patients (n = 2,645), the rate of all-cause death was 4.1/1,000 patient-years, of MI 6.5/1,000 patient-years, and of new/ worsened angina 5.7/1,000 patient-years. The incidence rates for MI and other cardiac events were low in these hypertension trials, and did not differ among treatment groups in either the amlodipine or nifedipine GITS comparative analyses. In the clinical trial databases analyzed, there is no signal suggesting excessive risk of death or cardiovascular events for hypertensive patients treated with amlodipine or nifedipine GITS.

摘要

近期有关钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)安全性的问题,促使人们对辉瑞公司氨氯地平(络活喜)和硝苯地平胃肠道治疗系统(GITS)制剂(拜新同)的高血压临床试验数据库中心血管事件及死亡的发生情况进行分析。对氨氯地平和硝苯地平GITS的对比试验及非对比试验数据进行了前瞻性定义分析。观察指标包括心血管和非心血管死亡,以及不良心血管事件,如新发/加重型心绞痛、心肌梗死(MI)、严重心律失常、中风、充血性心力衰竭和出血。在所有接受氨氯地平治疗的患者(n = 32,920)中,全因死亡、MI和新发/加重型心绞痛的发生率分别为每1000患者年暴露3.0、3.3和1.6例。仅在对比试验中的患者(n = 4,126)中,全因死亡率为每1000患者年4.1例,这与其他非CCB药物相当,且显著低于其他CCB药物(每1000患者年23.8例,p = 0.015),尽管发生率差异仅代表2例死亡。在所有接受硝苯地平GITS治疗的患者(n = 2,645)中,全因死亡率为每1000患者年4.1例,MI为每1000患者年6.5例,新发/加重型心绞痛为每1000患者年5.7例。在这些高血压试验中,MI和其他心脏事件的发生率较低,在氨氯地平或硝苯地平GITS对比分析中,各治疗组之间无差异。在所分析的临床试验数据库中,没有迹象表明接受氨氯地平或硝苯地平GITS治疗的高血压患者存在过高的死亡或心血管事件风险。

相似文献

1
Safety of long-acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers in hypertensive patients.长效二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂在高血压患者中的安全性
Am J Cardiol. 1998 Jan 15;81(2):163-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00868-0.
2
Quality of life and calcium channel blockade with nifedipine GITS versus amlodipine in hypertensive patients in Spain. Gastrointestinal Therapeutic System.西班牙高血压患者使用硝苯地平胃肠道治疗系统与氨氯地平进行钙通道阻滞治疗时的生活质量对比。胃肠道治疗系统
J Hypertens. 1998 Dec;16(12 Pt 1):1839-47. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199816120-00018.
3
Comparative effects of felodipine ER, amlodipine and nifedipine GITS on 24 h blood pressure control and trough to peak ratios in mild to moderate ambulatory hypertension: a forced titration study.非洛地平缓释片、氨氯地平和硝苯地平控释片对轻至中度动态高血压患者24小时血压控制及谷峰比值的比较效应:一项强制滴定研究。
Can J Cardiol. 1998 May;14(5):682-8.
4
Comparative efficacy of generic nifedipine versus brand-name amlodipine for hypertension management in Taiwan.比较硝苯地平 generic 与氨氯地平 brand-name 在台湾地区高血压管理中的疗效。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2022 Jul;24(7):870-877. doi: 10.1111/jch.14521. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
5
Long-acting dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers and sympathetic nervous system activity in hypertension: a literature review comparing amlodipine and nifedipine GITS.长效二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂与高血压患者的交感神经系统活性:一项比较氨氯地平和硝苯地平控释片的文献综述
Blood Press. 2012 Jul;21 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):3-10. doi: 10.3109/08037051.2012.690615. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
6
Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers and cardiovascular outcomes in elderly patients: a population-based study.二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂与老年患者的心血管结局:一项基于人群的研究。
Can J Cardiol. 2008 Aug;24(8):629-32. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(08)70651-2.
7
Comparison of the efficacy of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers in African American patients with hypertension. ISHIB Investigators Group. International Society on Hypertension in Blacks.二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂在非裔美国高血压患者中的疗效比较。ISHIB研究组。黑人高血压国际协会。
Arch Intern Med. 1998 Oct 12;158(18):2029-34. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.18.2029.
8
Mibefradil in the treatment of systemic hypertension: comparative studies with other calcium antagonists.米贝拉地尔治疗系统性高血压:与其他钙拮抗剂的对比研究。
Am J Cardiol. 1997 Aug 21;80(4B):27C-33C. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00567-5.
9
A randomized controlled trial on the blood pressure-lowering effect of amlodipine and nifedipine-GITS in sustained hypertension.硝苯地平控释片与氨氯地平治疗持续性高血压的降压疗效随机对照试验
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019 May;21(5):648-657. doi: 10.1111/jch.13543. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
10
Tolerability of high doses of lercanidipine versus high doses of other dihydropyridines in daily clinical practice: the TOLERANCE Study.在日常临床实践中高剂量乐卡地平与高剂量其他二氢吡啶类药物的耐受性比较:耐受性研究
Cardiovasc Ther. 2008 Spring;26(1):2-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-3466.2007.00035.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers and cardiovascular outcomes in elderly patients: a population-based study.二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂与老年患者的心血管结局:一项基于人群的研究。
Can J Cardiol. 2008 Aug;24(8):629-32. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(08)70651-2.
2
Combination therapy with renin-angiotensin system blockers: will amlodipine replace hydrochlorothiazide?肾素-血管紧张素系统阻滞剂联合治疗:氨氯地平会取代氢氯噻嗪吗?
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2007 Aug;9(4):284-90. doi: 10.1007/s11906-007-0052-0.
3
Dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists in the management of hypertension.
二氢吡啶类钙通道拮抗剂在高血压治疗中的应用
Drugs. 2007;67(9):1309-27. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200767090-00005.
4
Monotherapy versus combination therapy as first line treatment of uncomplicated arterial hypertension.单一疗法与联合疗法作为单纯性动脉高血压一线治疗的比较
Drugs. 2001;61(7):943-54. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200161070-00004.
5
Role of a third generation calcium antagonist in the management of hypertension.第三代钙拮抗剂在高血压治疗中的作用。
Drugs. 1999;57 Suppl 1:1-10. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199957001-00001.