• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“不问、不说、不追究”:军事政策与异性恋男性气质的建构

"Don't ask, don't tell, don't pursue": military policy and the construction of heterosexual masculinity.

作者信息

Britton D M, Williams C L

机构信息

University of Texas at Austin, USA.

出版信息

J Homosex. 1995;30(1):1-21. doi: 10.1300/J082v30n01_01.

DOI:10.1300/J082v30n01_01
PMID:8907596
Abstract

This paper presents a description and analysis of military policy excluding lesbians and gay men. First, we discuss the current policy, review its official rationale, and outline the various criticisms that have been made against it. Next, we suggest an alternative framework for the policy's persistence. Drawing on work in feminist theory, we argue that the military's restrictions on the service of lesbians and gay men reflects an institutional and cultural privileging of a heterosexual masculine ideal. We conclude by speculating on the interests that lie behind the perpetuation of this ideal of soldiering.

摘要

本文对排斥女同性恋者和男同性恋者的军事政策进行了描述和分析。首先,我们讨论当前政策,审视其官方理由,并概述针对该政策的各种批评。接下来,我们为该政策的持续存在提出一个替代框架。借鉴女性主义理论的研究成果,我们认为军队对女同性恋者和男同性恋者服役的限制反映了一种对异性恋男性理想的制度性和文化性偏袒。我们通过推测这种军人理想持续存在背后的利益因素来得出结论。

相似文献

1
"Don't ask, don't tell, don't pursue": military policy and the construction of heterosexual masculinity.“不问、不说、不追究”:军事政策与异性恋男性气质的建构
J Homosex. 1995;30(1):1-21. doi: 10.1300/J082v30n01_01.
2
Health hazards of "don't ask, don't tell".“不问,不说”政策的健康危害。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 16;363(25):2380-1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1012496. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
3
Intergroup Contact, Prejudicial Attitudes, and Policy Preferences: The Case of the U.S. Military's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" Policy.群体间接触、偏见态度与政策偏好:以美国军方“不问,不说”政策为例
J Soc Psychol. 2015 Jan-Feb;155(1):57-69. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2014.959886. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
4
Active duty military personnel presenting for care at a Gay Men's Health Clinic.现役军人前往男同性恋健康诊所就诊。
J Homosex. 2008;54(3):277-9. doi: 10.1080/00918360801982173.
5
Transgender people in the military: don't ask? Don't tell? Don't enlist!军队中的跨性别者:不询问?不透露?不招募!
J Homosex. 2013;60(2-3):436-57. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2013.744933.
6
The myth of the warrior: martial masculinity and the end of Don't Ask, Don't Tell.《勇士的神话:武术阳刚与“不问,不说”的终结》
J Homosex. 2013;60(2-3):381-400. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2013.744928.
7
The "don't ask, don't tell" policy and military performance.“不问不说”政策与军事表现。
Psychol Rep. 2005 Aug;97(1):74-6. doi: 10.2466/pr0.97.1.74-76.
8
Lesbian, gay, and bisexual victimization in the military: an unintended consequence of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell"?军队中的女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋受虐:“不问,不说”的意外后果?
Am Psychol. 2011 Oct;66(7):604-13. doi: 10.1037/a0024609.
9
From exclusion to acceptance: a case history of homosexuality in the U.S. Court of Military Appeals.从排斥到接受:美国军事上诉法院同性恋案件史。
J Homosex. 2013;60(2-3):250-72. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2013.744671.
10
Don't ask, don't tell: the same old policy in a new uniform?
J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1995 Fall;12(1):215-238.

引用本文的文献

1
Getting to the Root of the Problem: Supporting Clients With Lived-Experiences of Systemic Discrimination.追根溯源:为有系统性歧视亲身经历的客户提供支持。
Chronic Stress (Thousand Oaks). 2022 Nov 21;6:24705470221139205. doi: 10.1177/24705470221139205. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
2
LGBT in the Military: Policy Development in Sweden 1944-2014.军队中的LGBT群体:1944 - 2014年瑞典的政策发展
Sex Res Social Policy. 2016;13:119-129. doi: 10.1007/s13178-015-0217-6. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
3
Safe using messages may not be enough to promote behaviour change amongst injecting drug users who are ambivalent or indifferent towards death.
对于那些对死亡抱有无所谓或漠不关心态度的注射吸毒者而言,仅靠安全使用信息可能不足以促使其改变行为。
Harm Reduct J. 2009 Jul 25;6:18. doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-6-18.