Poelaert J, Jordaens L, Visser C A, De Clerck C, Herregods L
Department of Intensive Care, University Hospital, Gent, Belgium.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1996 Sep;40(8 Pt 1):913-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1996.tb04560.x.
Intraoperative testing and defibrillation threshold determination may jeopardise patients, scheduled for implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). The purpose of this study was the assessment of the influence of consecutive defibrillation attempts on left ventricular systolic and diastolic function by means of transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE).
Eighteen patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias that were resistant to antiarrhythmic drugs were monitored with TEE before, during and after implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator. Left ventricular fractional area contraction as a measure of ejection fraction was assessed before and after each defibrillation attempt. Transmitral and right upper pulmonary venous flow parameters were evaluated before and after the whole implantation procedure.
Adequate data were available in 14 patients during 4 consecutive attempts. No major alterations were observed in heart rate or fractional area contraction, measured at 30 s and 3 min after defibrillation. Overall, the ratio of early-to-late transmitral filling decreased significantly after the implantation procedure (from 0.91 +/- 0.12 to 0.82 +/- 0.14; P < 0.05). Systolic pulmonary venous flow velocity decreased from 0.49 +/- 0.11 to 0.41 +/- 0.10 m/s (P = 0.04); this decrease was observed in both groups. A significant increase of the atrial contraction wave (from 0.25 +/- 0.06 to 0.34 +/- 0.07 m/s; P < 0.03) was seen. Subdividing patients related to their precperative ejection fraction, a significant decrease of the early-to-late transmitral filling of the LV was revealed in patients with ejection fraction less than 35% (group 1). Also, a significantly lower systolic fraction of the pulmonary venous flow after ICD implantation in conjunction with a significantly longer diastolic flow time was shown in this patient group in comparison with patients with a preoperative ejection fraction of more than 35% (group 2).
Defibrillation threshold testing of the ICD system changes LV inflow characteristics and impedes diastolic function of the left ventricle and may thus precipitate heart failure by this mechanism. No deleterious effects of threshold testing were observed with respect to fractional area contraction nor any deterioration of LV function was found in a clinically significant amount due to consecutive defibrillation attempts.
术中测试及除颤阈值测定可能会对计划植入心脏复律除颤器(ICD)的患者造成危害。本研究的目的是通过经食管超声心动图(TEE)评估连续除颤尝试对左心室收缩和舒张功能的影响。
对18例对抗心律失常药物耐药的恶性室性心律失常患者在植入心脏复律除颤器之前、期间及之后进行TEE监测。在每次除颤尝试前后评估左心室面积分数缩短率作为射血分数的指标。在整个植入过程前后评估二尖瓣和右上肺静脉血流参数。
14例患者在连续4次尝试中有足够的数据。除颤后30秒和3分钟时测量的心率或面积分数缩短率未观察到重大改变。总体而言,植入过程后二尖瓣早到晚充盈率显著降低(从0.91±0.12降至0.82±0.14;P<0.05)。肺静脉收缩期血流速度从0.49±0.11降至0.41±0.10m/s(P=0.04);两组均观察到这种降低。心房收缩波显著增加(从0.25±0.06增至0.34±0.07m/s;P<0.03)。根据术前射血分数对患者进行分组,射血分数低于35%的患者(第1组)左心室二尖瓣早到晚充盈率显著降低。此外,与术前射血分数高于35%的患者(第2组)相比,该患者组在ICD植入后肺静脉血流收缩分数显著降低,同时舒张期血流时间显著延长。
ICD系统的除颤阈值测试改变了左心室流入特征,阻碍了左心室舒张功能,因此可能通过这种机制促使心力衰竭发生。未观察到阈值测试对面积分数缩短率有有害影响,连续除颤尝试也未导致临床上显著的左心室功能恶化。