Bowden G H
Department of Oral biology, faculty of Dentistry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg.
J Can Dent Assoc. 1996 Sep;62(9):700, 703-7.
Mutans streptococci, particularly Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus, can be shown to be highly associated with caries in humans. Together with Lactobacillus spp., they are regarded as significant odontopathogens. Because of their association with dental disease, an evaluation of the numbers of Mutans streptococci organisms in plaque and saliva may aid in the diagnosis of caries activity. In conjunction with this concept, control and prevention of caries has been sought by reducing the numbers of bacteria colonizing an individual. Despite the associations between dental disease and Mutans streptococci, which can be demonstrated in groups of people, these methods have not been entirely successful. Because of the wide range of factors involved, counts are not very effective in diagnosing caries activity or risk in an individual. Nevertheless, counts may be used to establish a normal pattern of colonization for a patient, and deviation from this pattern will indicate a change in their oral status, which can be included as a parameter in diagnosis. Accurate and relatively simple commercial tests for counting mutans streptococci and lactobacilli are available. In patients with high caries activity and high counts of mutans streptococci, chlorhexidine may be employed as an adjunct to other preventive measures. Chlorhexidine delivered in a gel form has been shown to be effective in the control and prevention of caries. Combinations of chlorhexidine with fluoride may be even more effective. Sustained release devices, like varnishes, reduce the numbers of mutans streptococci in a patient's mouth to levels below detection for long periods, but their effectiveness in preventing and controlling caries has not yet been assessed. The decision to use microbiological methods to aid diagnosis, and chlorhexidine to reduce or eliminate mutans streptococci, rests with the practitioner. Although the microbiological tests for caries activity or prediction are not 100 per cent accurate, they can be useful in certain situations. In addition, chlorhexidine as an adjunct in control and prevention of caries has been shown to have value. This short review introduces readers to the literature, so that they will not dismiss microbiology, but make decisions on the use of microbiological methods based on their own experience and the experience of others.
变形链球菌,尤其是变形链球菌和远缘链球菌,已被证明与人类龋齿高度相关。它们与乳酸杆菌属一起,被视为重要的口腔病原菌。由于它们与牙齿疾病的关联,评估菌斑和唾液中变形链球菌的数量可能有助于诊断龋齿活动情况。基于这一概念,人们一直试图通过减少个体口腔内的细菌数量来控制和预防龋齿。尽管在人群中可以证明牙齿疾病与变形链球菌之间存在关联,但这些方法并未完全成功。由于涉及的因素范围广泛,细菌计数在诊断个体的龋齿活动或风险方面并不是非常有效。然而,计数可用于为患者建立正常的定植模式,偏离这一模式将表明其口腔状况发生了变化,这可作为诊断参数。目前已有准确且相对简单的商业测试用于计数变形链球菌和乳酸杆菌。对于龋齿活动度高且变形链球菌数量多的患者,洗必泰可作为其他预防措施的辅助手段。以凝胶形式给药的洗必泰已被证明对控制和预防龋齿有效。洗必泰与氟化物联合使用可能更有效。缓释装置,如清漆,可将患者口腔内的变形链球菌数量长期降低到检测水平以下,但其预防和控制龋齿的效果尚未得到评估。是否使用微生物学方法辅助诊断以及使用洗必泰来减少或消除变形链球菌,由从业者决定。尽管用于龋齿活动或预测的微生物学测试并非100%准确,但在某些情况下它们可能会有所帮助。此外,洗必泰作为控制和预防龋齿的辅助手段已被证明具有价值。这篇简短的综述向读者介绍了相关文献,以便他们不会忽视微生物学,而是根据自己和他人的经验对微生物学方法的使用做出决策。