• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孤独的主观性及其应对方式。

The subjectivity of loneliness and coping with it.

作者信息

Rokach A

机构信息

Ontario Correctional Institute, Brampton, Canada.

出版信息

Psychol Rep. 1996 Oct;79(2):475-81. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1996.79.2.475.

DOI:10.2466/pr0.1996.79.2.475
PMID:8909071
Abstract

Previous research, upon which the present study is based, identified five clearly distinguished factors which comprise the loneliness experience: Emotional distress, Social inadequacy and alienation, Growth and discovery, Interpersonal isolation, and Self alienation. Further research indicated that the various coping strategies could be grouped into six factors, namely, Reflection and acceptance, Self-development and understanding. Social support network, Distancing and denial, Religion and faith, and Increased activity. The present study examined which were the most beneficial coping strategies, depending on the qualitative experience of lonely persons. The following coping strategies were identified as best suited to cope with and reduce the pain of loneliness. Acceptance and reflection, Social interaction, and Increased activity. Distancing from loneliness and attempts to ignore and deny it are the least effective and can, at best, be helpful on a temporary basis only.

摘要

本研究基于以往的研究,确定了构成孤独体验的五个明显不同的因素:情绪困扰、社交不足与疏离、成长与发现、人际孤立和自我疏离。进一步的研究表明,各种应对策略可分为六个因素,即反思与接受、自我发展与理解、社会支持网络、疏离与否认、宗教与信仰以及增加活动。本研究考察了根据孤独者的定性体验,哪些应对策略最有益。以下应对策略被确定为最适合应对和减轻孤独痛苦的策略。接受与反思、社交互动和增加活动。远离孤独以及试图忽视和否认孤独是最无效的,充其量只能在短期内有所帮助。

相似文献

1
The subjectivity of loneliness and coping with it.孤独的主观性及其应对方式。
Psychol Rep. 1996 Oct;79(2):475-81. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1996.79.2.475.
2
Relations of perceived causes and the experience of loneliness.感知到的原因与孤独体验之间的关系。
Psychol Rep. 1997 Jun;80(3 Pt 2):1067-74. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1997.80.3c.1067.
3
Surviving and coping with loneliness.战胜并应对孤独。
J Psychol. 1990 Jan;124(1):39-54. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1990.10543204.
4
Cancer patients, their caregivers and coping with loneliness.癌症患者、他们的照顾者和孤独应对。
Psychol Health Med. 2013;18(2):135-44. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2012.689839. Epub 2012 May 28.
5
Terminal illness and coping with loneliness.绝症与应对孤独
J Psychol. 2000 May;134(3):283-96. doi: 10.1080/00223980009600868.
6
The relationship between coping style and loneliness in adolescents: can "sad passivity" be adaptive?青少年应对方式与孤独感之间的关系:“悲伤被动”是否具有适应性?
J Genet Psychol. 1991 Jun;152(2):145-57. doi: 10.1080/00221325.1991.9914662.
7
Loneliness in domestically abused women.受家庭暴力侵害妇女的孤独感
Psychol Rep. 2006 Apr;98(2):367-73. doi: 10.2466/pr0.98.2.367-373.
8
Coping with loneliness: what do older adults suggest?应对孤独:老年人有何建议?
Aging Ment Health. 2012;16(3):353-60. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2011.630373. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
9
[Multidimensional assessment of coping: validation of the Brief COPE among French population].应对方式的多维评估:法国人群中简易应对方式问卷(Brief COPE)的效度验证
Encephale. 2003 Nov-Dec;29(6):507-18.
10
Loneliness, coping strategies and cognitive styles of the gifted rural adolescent.农村资优青少年的孤独感、应对策略与认知风格
Adolescence. 1990 Winter;25(100):977-88.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding older adults' smartphone addiction in the digital age: empirical evidence from China.理解数字时代老年人的智能手机成瘾:来自中国的实证证据。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 7;11:1136494. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1136494. eCollection 2023.
2
Loneliness is Associated With Lower Coping Self-Efficacy Among Older Adults.孤独与老年人应对自我效能感降低有关。
J Appl Gerontol. 2023 Feb;42(2):270-279. doi: 10.1177/07334648221129858. Epub 2022 Sep 30.