Oophorectomy status and bone density in older, hysterectomized women.

INTRODUCTION

This study examined the long-term effects of hysterectomy, with and without bilateral oophorectomy, and treatment with estrogen replacement on bone mineral density in older hysterectomized women.

METHODS

Subjects were 346 women 60-89 years of age, who were participants in the Rancho Bernardo Study and attended a follow-up clinic visit in 1988-1991. Bone density was measured at the ultradistal wrist, midshaft radius, lumbar spine and hip.

RESULTS

Of these women, 182 had a hysterectomy with conservation of one or both ovaries and 164 had a hysterectomy with bilateral oophorectomy. Current estrogen users had the highest bone densities; those who never used estrogen replacement had the lowest. Only 9.1% of oophorectomized women, compared to 19.2% of those with ovarian conservation had never used estrogen (P < .01). After adjustment for covariates including estrogen replacement therapy, hysterectomized women with ovarian conservation had marginally higher bone densities at the wrist (P < .09) and spine (P < .06) than oophorectomized women. We found significant differences only among women currently using estrogen (P < .05 for wrist and P < .01 for spine densities, respectively). Bone density did not differ at any site by oophorectomy status among past or never users of estrogen.

CONCLUSIONS

Hysterectomized women who use estrogen replacement therapy have better bone density, regardless of a bilateral oophorectomy. In addition, bilateral oophorectomy may not have a long-term negative effect on bone density; hysterectomized women who do not use estrogen appear to have equivalent bone density whether or not they had a bilateral oophorectomy.