Kingma J G, Armour J A, Rouleau J R
Québec Heart Institute, Laval Hospital, Ste-Foy, Canada.
Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1996 Jun;74(6):701-5.
Intramyocardial tissue pressure can influence distribution of ventricular blood flow and dynamics during the cardiac cycle. Left ventricular ventral wall subepicardial and subendocardial tissue pressures were measured simultaneously using two different types of solid-state micromanometers (5F Millar model SPR-230 and Konigsberg Instruments model P19 pressure transducers) and compared with left ventricular cavity pressure. Systolic pressures recorded by Millar and Konigsberg transducers were similar when the sensor surfaces faced the left ventricular cavity either in the endocardium or epicardium. Diastolic pressures in the epicardium were higher than left ventricular cavity pressure. When Millar and Konigsberg transducer were placed in the epicardium, with the pressure sensors facing epicardially, the output signal of the Millar transducer was out of phase with the signal of the Konigsberg transducer and left ventricular chamber pressure outputs. Results indicate that output signals for intramyocardial pressures vary depending on the direction of the Millar or Konigsberg pressure sensor in the left ventricular wall. Thus, pressure output signals vary depending on configuration of the sensor surface, relative flexibility of the connecting cables, and orientation of the sensor surface with respect to left ventricular anatomy.
心肌内组织压力可影响心动周期中心室血流分布和动力学。使用两种不同类型的固态微测压计(5F Millar型号SPR - 230和Konigsberg Instruments型号P19压力传感器)同时测量左心室前壁心外膜下和心内膜下组织压力,并与左心室腔压力进行比较。当传感器表面在心内膜或心外膜面向左心室腔时,Millar和Konigsberg传感器记录的收缩压相似。心外膜的舒张压高于左心室腔压力。当Millar和Konigsberg传感器置于心外膜,压力传感器面向心外膜时,Millar传感器的输出信号与Konigsberg传感器的信号以及左心室腔压力输出信号不同步。结果表明,心肌内压力的输出信号因Millar或Konigsberg压力传感器在左心室壁中的方向而异。因此,压力输出信号因传感器表面的配置、连接电缆的相对柔韧性以及传感器表面相对于左心室解剖结构的方向而异。