Luker G D, Bae K T, Siegel M J, Don S, Brink J A, Wang G, Herman T E
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Nov;167(5):1189-93. doi: 10.2214/ajr.167.5.8911178.
The study was designed to compare helical CT with varying pitch and reconstruction intervals and conventional CT for revealing pulmonary nodules in a model that simulates respiratory motion in children.
CT scans were obtained in an experimental model with one nodule (3 or 10 mm) in each scan. One-second scans were obtained at rates of 10, 20, and 30 respirations per minute using conventional CT with 4-mm collimation and table incrementation and helical CT with 4-mm collimation and either 4-mm/sec (pitch, 1:1) or 8-mm/sec (pitch, 2:1) table speed. Reconstructions were at 1-, 2-, and 4-mm intervals for scans obtained using 4-mm/sec table speed and at 1- and 4-mm intervals for scans obtained using 8-mm/sec table speed. Images were independently reviewed by three radiologists who estimated the number of nodules on each image.
Ghosting (depiction of more than one nodule in a study) was seen in 79%, 80%, and 75% of helical CT scans obtained with a 1:1 pitch using 1-, 2-, and 4-mm reconstruction intervals, respectively. By comparison, ghosting was seen in only 54% and 58% of helical CT scans with a 2:1 pitch using 1-mm reconstruction intervals and 4-mm reconstruction intervals, respectively, and in 56% of conventional CT scans (p < .0001). A single nodule was detected on all other scans, and at least one nodule was seen on all scans.
Ghosting of nodules is common in this model. Ghosting was seen less often on conventional scans and helical scans with 2:1 pitch than it was on helical scans with 1:1 pitch. Nonetheless, ghosting was seen on more than 50% of all scans with each technique.
本研究旨在比较不同螺距和重建间隔的螺旋CT与传统CT在模拟儿童呼吸运动的模型中显示肺结节的情况。
在一个实验模型中进行CT扫描,每次扫描有一个结节(3或10毫米)。使用4毫米准直和床移动的传统CT以及4毫米准直、床速为4毫米/秒(螺距,1:1)或8毫米/秒(螺距,2:1)的螺旋CT,以每分钟10、20和30次呼吸的速率进行1秒扫描。对于使用4毫米/秒床速获得的扫描,重建间隔为1、2和4毫米;对于使用8毫米/秒床速获得的扫描,重建间隔为1和4毫米。由三位放射科医生独立评估图像,他们估计每张图像上的结节数量。
分别使用1、2和4毫米重建间隔,螺距为1:1的螺旋CT扫描中,79%、80%和75%出现了重影(在一次检查中显示多个结节)。相比之下,螺距为2:1的螺旋CT扫描中,分别使用1毫米重建间隔和4毫米重建间隔时,重影出现率仅为54%和58%,传统CT扫描的重影出现率为56%(p <.0001)。在所有其他扫描中均检测到单个结节,且所有扫描中至少可见一个结节。
在该模型中结节重影很常见。与螺距为1:1的螺旋扫描相比,传统扫描和螺距为2:1的螺旋扫描中重影出现的频率较低。尽管如此,每种技术的所有扫描中超过50%都出现了重影。