Chen X, Christou N V
Department of Surgery, McGill University, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Quebec.
Arch Surg. 1996 Nov;131(11):1148-53; discussion 1153-4. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430230030006.
To examine the relative contribution of polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN) vs endothelial cell (EC) activation on the adherence and subsequent killing of ECs by PMNs.
In vitro comparative studies of PMN-EC adherence and cytotoxicity.
Research laboratory and the surgical intensive care unit of a tertiary-level university hospital.
Patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome admitted to the surgical intensive care unit and hospitalized preoperative noninfected surgical patients.
None.
Polymorphonuclear neutrophils were isolated from 21 healthy volunteers, 22 preoperative patients, and 30 patients from the surgical intensive care unit with systemic inflammatory response syndrome. The PMNs were activated with lipopolysaccharide, 100 ng/mL (Escherichia coli 0111:b4), for 40 minutes at 37 degrees C before the adherence and cytotoxicity assays. Human umbilical vein endothelial monolayers were stimulated with tumor necrosis factor alpha, 25 ng/mL, and interleukin 1 beta, 15 U/mL, for 3 hours. The PMNs or EC cells were labeled with sodium chromate Cr 51 and used in a standard adherence or killing assay as required.
Control and preoperative patient PMN treatment with lipopolysaccharide produced a modest increase in adherence. The PMNs from patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome showed moderately increased human umbilical vein endothelial cell adherence, and this could not be augmented further with lipopolysaccharide stimulation. There was a marked increase in PMN adherence to EC after EC activation in all study groups (P < .001). Similar to the adherence data, human umbilical vein endothelial cell cytotoxicity was significantly increased in all groups after human umbilical vein endothelial cell activation (P < .01) but not after PMN stimulation with lipopolysaccharide.
These data suggest that stimulation of ECs is far more important in producing increased adherence and cytotoxicity of EC than PMN stimulation with lipopolysaccharide in all study groups. Therapeutic efforts in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome should be focused on the EC.
研究多形核中性粒细胞(PMN)与内皮细胞(EC)激活对PMN黏附及随后杀伤EC的相对作用。
PMN-EC黏附及细胞毒性的体外对比研究。
一所三级大学医院的研究实验室及外科重症监护病房。
入住外科重症监护病房的全身炎症反应综合征患者及术前住院的未感染外科患者。
无。
从21名健康志愿者、22名术前患者及30名患有全身炎症反应综合征的外科重症监护病房患者中分离出多形核中性粒细胞。在进行黏附及细胞毒性检测前,将PMN用100 ng/mL脂多糖(大肠杆菌0111:b4)在37℃激活40分钟。用人肿瘤坏死因子α 25 ng/mL和白细胞介素1β 15 U/mL刺激人脐静脉内皮细胞单层3小时。将PMN或EC细胞用铬酸钠Cr 51标记,并根据需要用于标准黏附或杀伤检测。
用脂多糖处理对照及术前患者的PMN,黏附略有增加。全身炎症反应综合征患者的PMN对人脐静脉内皮细胞的黏附适度增加,且脂多糖刺激不能使其进一步增强。在所有研究组中,EC激活后PMN对EC的黏附显著增加(P <.001)。与黏附数据相似,人脐静脉内皮细胞激活后所有组的人脐静脉内皮细胞毒性均显著增加(P <.01),但PMN用脂多糖刺激后则不然。
这些数据表明,在所有研究组中,刺激EC在增加EC的黏附及细胞毒性方面比用脂多糖刺激PMN重要得多。对全身炎症反应综合征患者的治疗应聚焦于EC。