• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与成功的工作强化训练结果相关的因素。

Factors related to successful work hardening outcomes.

作者信息

Beissner K L, Saunders R L, McManis B G

机构信息

Ithaca College, NY 14850, USA.

出版信息

Phys Ther. 1996 Nov;76(11):1188-201. doi: 10.1093/ptj/76.11.1188.

DOI:10.1093/ptj/76.11.1188
PMID:8911432
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to identify factors that predict successful work hardening outcomes. Two measures of success were used: return to work and case closure (ie, resolution of medical treatment issues).

SUBJECTS

Persons with spine-related injuries who completed a work hardening program were the subjects. One hundred fifteen subjects participated in a 3-month follow-up survey, and 111 subjects participated in a 12-month follow-up survey.

METHODS

Data were collected on subject characteristics, treatment history, job factors, program payer, and program factors. Subjects were contacted by telephone at 3 and 12 months after program completion to determine work status. Logit analysis was used to identify predictors of successful versus unsuccessful outcomes.

RESULTS

Three months after program completion, 68% of the subjects had returned to work and 86% had successful case closure. Twelve months after program completion, 77% of the subjects had returned to work and 90% had successful case closure. The more treatment subjects received prior to entering the program, the less likely they were to be working or achieving case closure following treatment. Subjects' work status and initial time off of work were factors predicting early return to work, but not 12 months after program completion. Subjects who were working with an attorney were less likely to achieve case closure than those who were not working with an attorney. Subjects who were satisfied with the program were more likely to have achieved case closure or return to work than those who were not satisfied with the program.

CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION

Several factors have been identified that predict successful work hardening outcomes. This information can be used to identify clients who are unlikely to benefit from work hardening.

摘要

背景与目的

本研究旨在确定能够预测工作强化治疗成功结果的因素。采用了两种成功衡量标准:重返工作岗位和病例结案(即医疗问题得到解决)。

研究对象

完成工作强化治疗项目的脊柱相关损伤患者为研究对象。115名研究对象参与了为期3个月的随访调查,111名研究对象参与了为期12个月的随访调查。

方法

收集了有关研究对象特征、治疗史、工作因素、项目付费方和项目因素的数据。在项目完成后的3个月和12个月通过电话联系研究对象以确定其工作状态。采用逻辑回归分析来确定成功与不成功结果的预测因素。

结果

项目完成3个月后,68%的研究对象重返工作岗位,86%的病例成功结案。项目完成12个月后,77%的研究对象重返工作岗位,90%的病例成功结案。在进入项目之前接受治疗越多的研究对象,在治疗后工作或实现病例结案的可能性就越小。研究对象的工作状态和最初的停工时间是预测早期重返工作岗位的因素,但不是项目完成12个月后的预测因素。与律师合作的研究对象比未与律师合作的研究对象更难实现病例结案。对项目满意的研究对象比不满意的研究对象更有可能实现病例结案或重返工作岗位。

结论与讨论

已确定了几个能够预测工作强化治疗成功结果的因素。这些信息可用于识别不太可能从工作强化治疗中受益的客户。

相似文献

1
Factors related to successful work hardening outcomes.与成功的工作强化训练结果相关的因素。
Phys Ther. 1996 Nov;76(11):1188-201. doi: 10.1093/ptj/76.11.1188.
2
Work hardening: past, present, and future--the work programs special interest section national work-hardening outcome study.
Am J Occup Ther. 1994 Apr;48(4):327-39. doi: 10.5014/ajot.48.4.327.
3
Nonphysical factors that affect work hardening success: a retrospective study.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1995 Dec;22(6):238-46. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1995.22.6.238.
4
Work hardening: Outdated fad or effective intervention?工作强化训练:过时的风尚还是有效的干预措施?
Work. 2001;16(3):235-243.
5
Outcome evaluation of work hardening program for manual workers with work-related back injury.对患有与工作相关背部损伤的体力劳动者进行工作强化训练计划的结果评估。
Work. 2005;25(4):297-305.
6
Increased pain tolerance as an indicator of return to work in low-back injuries after work hardening.
Am J Occup Ther. 2001 Mar-Apr;55(2):200-5. doi: 10.5014/ajot.55.2.200.
7
Work hardening: evidence for success of a program.
Psychol Rep. 1995 Dec;77(3 Pt 2):1077-8. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1995.77.3f.1077.
8
[Vocational performance tests for brain-injured patients: a follow-up study].[脑损伤患者的职业表现测试:一项随访研究]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2005 Aug;44(4):222-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-866905.
9
Predictors of success for state vocational rehabilitation clients with traumatic brain injury.患有创伤性脑损伤的州职业康复客户成功的预测因素。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Feb;84(2):161-7. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2003.50098.
10
Spinal rehabilitation by work tolerance based on objective physical capacity assessment of dysfunction. A prospective study with control subjects and twelve-month review.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990 Dec;15(12):1325-32. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199012000-00017.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Associated With Success in an Occupational Rehabilitation Program for Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders.与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病职业康复计划成功相关的因素。
Am J Occup Ther. 2017 Jan/Feb;71(1):7101190040p1-7101190040p8. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2016.023200.
2
Employer, insurance, and health system response to long-term sick leave in the public sector: policy implications.雇主、保险机构及卫生系统对公共部门长期病假的应对措施:政策影响
J Occup Rehabil. 2005 Jun;15(2):167-76. doi: 10.1007/s10926-005-1216-x.
3
The effectiveness of ergonomic interventions on return-to-work after low back pain; a prospective two year cohort study in six countries on low back pain patients sicklisted for 3-4 months.
人体工程学干预对腰痛后重返工作岗位的有效性;一项针对六个国家因腰痛而病休3 - 4个月患者的前瞻性两年队列研究。
Occup Environ Med. 2004 Apr;61(4):289-94. doi: 10.1136/oem.2002.006460.
4
Employer, physical therapist, and employee outcomes in the management of work-related upper extremity disorders.与工作相关的上肢疾病管理中的雇主、物理治疗师及员工的结果
J Occup Rehabil. 2002 Dec;12(4):257-67. doi: 10.1023/a:1020222623882.
5
Relation between indicators for quality of occupational rehabilitation of employees with low back pain.腰痛员工职业康复质量指标之间的关系。
Occup Environ Med. 1999 Jul;56(7):488-93. doi: 10.1136/oem.56.7.488.