Tugwell P
Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa General Hospital, Ontario, Canada.
Drugs. 1996;52 Suppl 3:48-58. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199600523-00008.
Economic evaluation in osteoarthritis is still uncommon, despite the many studies performed in other disease settings. Policy makers are increasingly recognising that the unit purchase price of the drug is not as meaningful as cost-effectiveness analyses that take into account the frequency and magnitude of its benefits and adverse effects. Thus, there is an urgent need for agreement on the methods to be used to allow meaningful comparisons; critical first steps consist of inclusion of common end-point disease-specific and generic scales, and concurrent assessment of costs in future clinical trials. When applying the results from other countries, careful attention should be paid to taking into account differences in clinical practice, in the values and preferences of the patients, and in the costs of the drugs and resources used or saved as a consequence of the benefits and adverse effects.
尽管在其他疾病领域已开展了诸多研究,但骨关节炎的经济学评估仍不常见。政策制定者越来越认识到,药物的单位采购价格不如考虑其效益和不良反应的频率及程度的成本效益分析有意义。因此,迫切需要就用于进行有意义比较的方法达成共识;关键的首要步骤包括纳入针对特定疾病和通用的共同终点量表,并在未来临床试验中同时评估成本。在应用其他国家的结果时,应谨慎考虑临床实践、患者价值观和偏好以及因效益和不良反应而使用或节省的药物及资源成本方面的差异。