• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

环磷酰胺+甲氨蝶呤+氟尿嘧啶辅助化疗对淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者的成本效益分析

Cost-effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide+methotrexate+fluorouracil in patients with node-positive breast cancer.

作者信息

Messori A, Becagli P, Trippoli S, Tendi E

机构信息

Drug Information Centre, Azienda Ospedaliera Careggi, Florence, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1996;51(2):111-6. doi: 10.1007/s002280050169.

DOI:10.1007/s002280050169
PMID:8911873
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The analysis of published survival curves can be used as the basis for incremental cost-effectiveness analyses in which two treatments are compared with each other in terms of cost per life year saved. In patients with node-positive breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide+ methotrexate+fluorouracil has been reported to improve survival in comparison with patients who are not given this treatment.

METHODS

To assess the pharmacoeconomic profile of this adjuvant chemotherapeutic regimen in terms of cost per life-year gained, we conducted an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis in which the Gompertz model was used to calculate the lifetime estimate of the patient-years gained by treated subjects compared to controls.

RESULTS

Using data from a published, controlled long-term trial involving 207 patients treated with cyclophosphamide+methotrexate+fluorouracil and 179 controls, we estimated that this adjuvant chemotherapy improved life expectancy by 357 patient-years per 100 subjects. Direct costs, which were almost exclusively related to the administration of chemotherapy, were estimated to be US $159,516 per 100 patients. On the basis of these data, adjuvant chemotherapy was found to imply an incremental cost of US $447 per life-year saved.

CONCLUSIONS

The cost-effectiveness ratio of adjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide+methotrexate+fluorouracil in patients with node-positive breast cancer seems to be particularly favourable in comparison with estimates of cost per life-year saved previously calculated for other types of pharmacological intervention.

摘要

背景

已发表的生存曲线分析可作为增量成本效益分析的基础,在这种分析中,两种治疗方法根据每挽救一个生命年的成本相互比较。据报道,对于淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者,与未接受环磷酰胺+甲氨蝶呤+氟尿嘧啶辅助化疗的患者相比,接受该化疗可提高生存率。

方法

为了根据每获得一个生命年的成本评估这种辅助化疗方案的药物经济学特征,我们进行了一项增量成本效益分析,其中使用Gompertz模型计算接受治疗的受试者与对照组相比获得的患者生命年的终生估计值。

结果

利用一项已发表的涉及207例接受环磷酰胺+甲氨蝶呤+氟尿嘧啶治疗的患者和179例对照的对照长期试验的数据,我们估计这种辅助化疗每100名受试者可使预期寿命提高357个患者生命年。直接成本几乎完全与化疗给药相关,估计每100名患者为159,516美元。基于这些数据,发现辅助化疗每挽救一个生命年的增量成本为447美元。

结论

与先前为其他类型的药物干预计算的每挽救一个生命年的成本估计值相比,环磷酰胺+甲氨蝶呤+氟尿嘧啶辅助化疗在淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者中的成本效益比似乎特别有利。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide+methotrexate+fluorouracil in patients with node-positive breast cancer.环磷酰胺+甲氨蝶呤+氟尿嘧啶辅助化疗对淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者的成本效益分析
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1996;51(2):111-6. doi: 10.1007/s002280050169.
2
Docetaxel in combination with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as adjuvant treatment for early node-positive breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis.多西他赛联合阿霉素和环磷酰胺作为早期淋巴结阳性乳腺癌的辅助治疗:成本效益和成本效用分析
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Feb 20;26(6):925-33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.4190.
3
Cost effectiveness of adjuvant intraportal chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer.
J Clin Gastroenterol. 1996 Dec;23(4):269-74. doi: 10.1097/00004836-199612000-00006.
4
Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil for node-positive breast cancer: a lifetime cost-utility analysis based on a modified Q-TWIST method.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1997;53(3-4):281-2. doi: 10.1007/s002280050378.
5
Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil (CMF) in breast cancer--is it cost-effective?
Acta Oncol. 2000;39(1):33-9. doi: 10.1080/028418600430941.
6
Docetaxel for the adjuvant treatment of early node-positive breast cancer: a single technology appraisal.多西他赛用于早期淋巴结阳性乳腺癌的辅助治疗:单技术评估
Health Technol Assess. 2009 Jun;13 Suppl 1:7-13. doi: 10.3310/hta13suppl1/02.
7
Adjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil, vincristine, and prednisone compared with single-agent L-phenylalanine mustard for patients with operable breast carcinoma and positive axillary lymph nodes: 20-year results of a Southwest Oncology Group study.环磷酰胺、甲氨蝶呤、5-氟尿嘧啶、长春新碱和泼尼松辅助化疗与单药左旋苯丙氨酸氮芥治疗可手术乳腺癌且腋窝淋巴结阳性患者的比较:西南肿瘤协作组20年研究结果
Cancer. 2003 Jan 1;97(1):21-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10982.
8
Cost-effectiveness analysis of adjuvant docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TAC) for node-positive breast cancer: modeling the downstream effects.多西他赛、阿霉素和环磷酰胺(TAC)辅助治疗淋巴结阳性乳腺癌的成本效益分析:模拟下游效应
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Apr;114(3):579-87. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-0034-1. Epub 2008 Apr 29.
9
The cost-effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer: A comparison of no chemotherapy and first, second, and third generation regimens for patients with differing prognoses.早期乳腺癌辅助化疗的成本效益:不同预后患者的无化疗与第一代、第二代和第三代方案的比较。
Eur J Cancer. 2011 Nov;47(17):2517-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.06.019. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
10
Randomized trial of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil chemotherapy compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil with node-positive breast cancer in Japan.日本一项随机试验比较了环磷酰胺、表柔比星和氟尿嘧啶化疗与环磷酰胺、甲氨蝶呤和氟尿嘧啶在阳性淋巴结乳腺癌中的疗效。
Breast Cancer. 2010 Jul;17(3):190-8. doi: 10.1007/s12282-009-0132-x. Epub 2009 Jul 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-utility analysis of adjuvant goserelin (Zoladex) and adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal women with breast cancer.辅助戈舍瑞林(诺雷德)与辅助化疗用于绝经前乳腺癌妇女的成本-效用分析。
BMC Cancer. 2012 Jan 21;12:33. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-33.
2
Lifetime cost-utility analysis of patients with refractory epilepsy treated with adjunctive topiramate therapy : cost-effectiveness in refractory epilepsy.伴有附加托吡酯治疗的耐药性癫痫患者的终生成本-效用分析:耐药性癫痫的成本效益。
Clin Drug Investig. 2003;23(4):225-32. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200323040-00002.
3
Pharmacoeconomic analysis of adjuvant oral capecitabine vs intravenous 5-FU/LV in Dukes' C colon cancer: the X-ACT trial.
卡培他滨口服辅助治疗与5-氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙静脉注射辅助治疗在Dukes' C期结肠癌中的药物经济学分析:X-ACT试验
Br J Cancer. 2006 Apr 24;94(8):1122-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603059.
4
Cost effectiveness of riluzole in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Italian Cooperative Group for the Study of Meta-Analysis and the Osservatorio SIFO sui Farmaci.利鲁唑治疗肌萎缩侧索硬化症的成本效益。意大利荟萃分析研究合作组及意大利药物观察站
Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 Aug;16(2):153-63. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199916020-00004.
5
Drug treatments for maintaining remission in Crohn's disease. A lifetime cost-utility analysis.
Pharmacoeconomics. 1997 May;11(5):444-53. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199711050-00006.
6
Current controversies in the application of meta-analysis (with special reference to oncological treatments).荟萃分析应用中的当前争议(特别涉及肿瘤治疗)
Pharm World Sci. 1997 Jun;19(3):152-8. doi: 10.1023/a:1008623701102.