• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伴有附加托吡酯治疗的耐药性癫痫患者的终生成本-效用分析:耐药性癫痫的成本效益。

Lifetime cost-utility analysis of patients with refractory epilepsy treated with adjunctive topiramate therapy : cost-effectiveness in refractory epilepsy.

机构信息

Laboratorio SIFO di Farmacoeconomia, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Drug Investig. 2003;23(4):225-32. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200323040-00002.

DOI:10.2165/00044011-200323040-00002
PMID:17535035
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness profile of topiramate as adjunctive treatment in patients with refractory epilepsy.

STUDY DESIGN

Lifetime cost-utility analysis based on a pharmacoeconomic model.

METHODS

Effectiveness data (seizure frequency reduction) were derived from the most recent placebo-controlled clinical trial, whilst quality of life and cost data were retrieved from the published literature. Our pharmacoeconomic model was based on a patient-level approach that incorporated the clinical data of the randomised, controlled trial.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS

Our analysis showed that chronic topiramate treatment costs pound21 353 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained (incremental lifetime cost of pound1 024 941 and incremental utility of 48 QALYs, for every 100 patients) [discounted values with a yearly rate of 3%] (year of costing 2001). Sensitivity analyses suggested a range from pound19 915 to pound24 518 per QALY gained.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed that adjunctive topiramate therapy has a favourable pharmacoeconomic profile in patients with refractory epilepsy.

摘要

目的

评估托吡酯作为难治性癫痫辅助治疗的成本效益情况。

研究设计

基于药物经济学模型的终生成本-效用分析。

方法

有效性数据(癫痫发作频率降低)源自最近的安慰剂对照临床试验,而生活质量和成本数据则从已发表的文献中获得。我们的药物经济学模型基于患者水平的方法,纳入了随机对照试验的临床数据。

主要观察指标和结果

我们的分析表明,慢性托吡酯治疗的成本为每获得 1 个质量调整生命年(QALY)需要 21353 英镑(每 100 例患者的终身增量成本为 1024941 英镑,增量效用为 48QALY)[贴现率为 3%(成本计价年为 2001 年)]。敏感性分析表明,每获得 1 个 QALY 的成本在 19915 英镑至 24518 英镑之间。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,托吡酯辅助治疗在难治性癫痫患者中有良好的药物经济学效益。

相似文献

1
Lifetime cost-utility analysis of patients with refractory epilepsy treated with adjunctive topiramate therapy : cost-effectiveness in refractory epilepsy.伴有附加托吡酯治疗的耐药性癫痫患者的终生成本-效用分析:耐药性癫痫的成本效益。
Clin Drug Investig. 2003;23(4):225-32. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200323040-00002.
2
Adjunctive lamotrigine therapy in patients with refractory seizures: a lifetime cost-utility analysis.难治性癫痫患者辅助使用拉莫三嗪治疗:终生成本效用分析
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1998 Feb;53(6):421-7. doi: 10.1007/s002280050402.
3
Cost-utility analysis of rufinamide versus topiramate and lamotrigine for the treatment of children with Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome in the United Kingdom.在英国,对治疗 Lennox-Gastaut 综合征的儿童,使用鲁非酰胺与托吡酯和拉莫三嗪的成本-效用分析。
Seizure. 2010 Jan;19(1):1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2009.10.003. Epub 2009 Nov 25.
4
Infliximab: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in rheumatoid arthritis.英夫利昔单抗:对其在类风湿关节炎治疗中应用的药物经济学综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(2):107-32. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422020-00004.
5
Repaglinide : a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus.瑞格列奈:对其在2型糖尿病治疗中应用的药物经济学综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(6):389-411. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422060-00005.
6
Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking in the Management of Keratoconus in Canada: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.加拿大圆锥角膜管理中的角膜胶原交联:成本效益分析。
Ophthalmology. 2017 Aug;124(8):1108-1119. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.03.019. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
7
Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the implantable miniature telescope.可植入微型望远镜的比较效果和成本效益。
Ophthalmology. 2011 Sep;118(9):1834-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.02.012. Epub 2011 Jul 2.
8
Comparative outcomes and cost-utility following surgical treatment of focal lumbar spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: part 2--estimated lifetime incremental cost-utility ratios.与髋或膝关节骨关节炎相比,手术治疗局限性腰椎椎管狭窄症的比较结果和成本效用:第 2 部分——估计终生增量成本效用比。
Spine J. 2014 Feb 1;14(2):244-54. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.11.011. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
9
Cost-effectiveness of topiramate in migraine prevention: results from a pharmacoeconomic model of topiramate treatment.托吡酯预防偏头痛的成本效益:托吡酯治疗药物经济学模型的结果
Headache. 2005 Sep;45(8):1012-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2005.05182.x.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Economic evaluation of deep brain stimulation compared with vagus nerve stimulation and usual care for patients with refractory epilepsy: A lifetime decision analytic model.深部脑刺激与迷走神经刺激和常规护理治疗耐药性癫痫患者的经济学评价:一种终身决策分析模型。
Epilepsia. 2022 Mar;63(3):641-651. doi: 10.1111/epi.17158. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
2
Assessment of components included in published societal perspective or QALY outcome economic analyses for antiepileptic drug treatment in chronic epilepsy.对已发表的关于慢性癫痫抗癫痫药物治疗的社会视角或质量调整生命年(QALY)结果经济分析中所包含的组成部分的评估。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2018 Oct;18(5):487-503. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2018.1489243. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
3

本文引用的文献

1
National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE): Is economic appraisal working?国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE):经济评估是否有效?
Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20 Suppl 3:95-105. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200220003-00010.
2
Low-dose topiramate in adults with treatment-resistant partial-onset seizures.低剂量托吡酯用于治疗成人耐药性局灶性发作
Acta Neurol Scand. 2002 Oct;106(4):183-9. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0404.2002.02071.x.
3
Economic evaluation of antiepileptic drug therapy: a methodologic review.抗癫痫药物治疗的经济学评价:方法学综述
The cost effectiveness of newer epilepsy treatments: a review of the literature on partial-onset seizures.
新型癫痫治疗的成本效益:部分发作性癫痫文献回顾。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 Oct 1;30(10):903-23. doi: 10.2165/11597110-000000000-00000.
4
Cost effectiveness of lacosamide in the adjunctive treatment of patients with refractory focal epilepsy in Belgium.拉科酰胺辅助治疗比利时耐药性局灶性癫痫患者的成本效益分析。
CNS Drugs. 2012 Apr 1;26(4):337-50. doi: 10.2165/11599240-000000000-00000.
5
Prescribing antiepileptic drugs: should patients be switched on the basis of cost?抗癫痫药物的处方:患者是否应根据成本进行换药?
CNS Drugs. 2004;18(10):617-28. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200418100-00001.
Epilepsia. 2002 May;43(5):550-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.2002.46401.x.
4
Comparing the cost of epilepsy across eight European countries.比较八个欧洲国家癫痫的治疗成本。
Epilepsy Res. 2001 Feb;43(2):89-95. doi: 10.1016/s0920-1211(00)00168-6.
5
Uptake and costs of care for epilepsy: findings from a U.K. regional study.
Epilepsia. 1998 Jul;39(7):776-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1998.tb01164.x.
6
Adjunctive lamotrigine therapy in patients with refractory seizures: a lifetime cost-utility analysis.难治性癫痫患者辅助使用拉莫三嗪治疗:终生成本效用分析
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1998 Feb;53(6):421-7. doi: 10.1007/s002280050402.
7
Cost-effectiveness of interferon alfa in chronic myelogenous leukemia.干扰素α在慢性粒细胞白血病中的成本效益
J Clin Oncol. 1997 Jul;15(7):2673-82. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.7.2673.
8
Pharmacoeconomic profile of paclitaxel as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma. A lifetime cost-effectiveness analysis.紫杉醇作为晚期卵巢癌患者一线治疗药物的药物经济学概况。一项终身成本效益分析。
Cancer. 1997 Jun 1;79(11):2264-6. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19970701)79:11<2264::aid-cncr29>3.0.co;2-s.
9
Cost-effectiveness of interferon-alpha as maintenance therapy in chronic myelogenous leukemia.α干扰素作为慢性粒细胞白血病维持治疗的成本效益
Ann Intern Med. 1997 Apr 15;126(8):664-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-126-8-199704150-00026.
10
Cost-effectiveness of autologous bone marrow transplantation in patients with relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.复发非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者自体骨髓移植的成本效益
Bone Marrow Transplant. 1997 Feb;19(3):275-81. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1700642.