Türker K S, Schmied A, Cheng H B
Department of Physiology, University of Adelaide, Australia.
Exp Brain Res. 1996 Oct;111(3):455-64. doi: 10.1007/BF00228735.
Spike trains of long duration were recorded from concurrently active pairs of motor units in the human masseter and tibialis anterior muscles. An innovative analysis technique was used to investigate functional coupling between the motoneurons by plotting the discharge frequency of one motor unit with respect to the firing times of the other (peri-spike frequencygram). Conventional cross-correlograms of discharge times were also constructed for each pair to detect synchronous firing and to compare them with the peri-spike frequencygrams (PSFs). The PSFs were examined with the hypothesis that, if the net common input of the two motoneurons was excitatory, the firing frequency of both units should increase around the time of the synchronous discharge of both units (i.e., time zero in the cross-correlogram). Conversely, if the net common input was inhibitory, the firing frequency of both units should fall around time zero. In 24 out of 37 masseter pairs tested, either one (n = 20) or both (n = 4) units of the pair displayed a statistically significant increase (P < 0.001) in the firing frequency around time zero of the PSF. No significant decrease in the discharge frequency was ever detected in any of the units of the 37 pairs tested. The probability of occurrence of a significant increase in firing rate was found to be significantly higher X2 = 5, P < 0.05) in the pairs with significant synchronous firing (13 out of 15) than in the pairs without (11 out of 22). Moreover, the percentage increase in the discharge frequency was found to be significantly higher in the pairs with significant synchronous activity (1.4%) than in those without (0.74%). In 24 out of 56 tibialis anterior pairs tested, either one (n = 19) or both (n = 5) units of the pairs displayed significant changes (P < 0.001) in discharge frequency around time zero of the PSF. A reduction in the mean firing rate starting about 20 ms before time zero and ending around time zero was most commonly detected in the PSF, the probability of this occurrence being significantly higher (X2 = 6.7, P < 0.01) in the pairs with significant synchronous discharges (18 out of 41) than in the pairs without (1 out of 15). However, the mean percentage fall in the firing frequency during this "inhibitory" phase did not correlate in amplitude with the presence or the absence of significant synchronous activity (-1.4% and -1.1% respectively). In many of the cases, this "inhibitory" period was followed by an "excitatory" period where the firing frequency displayed a significant increase (from about 6 ms to 20 ms past time zero). Such dual changes in the firing rate were only found in the pairs with significant synchronous activity (13 of the 41 pairs). The mean percentage increase in the firing frequency during the "excitatory" phase was significantly higher in the pairs with synchronous firing than in the pair without (1.4% and 0.5% respectively). The specificity of the frequency changes was assessed by performing control analyses where the discharge from one unit was cross-correlated with the discharge from the other unit at a different time (time-shuffled pairs). Synchronisation peaks were never observed in the cross-correlograms of the time-shuffled pairs. Furthermore, none of the 18 time-shuffled pairs in the masseter showed significant frequency changes in the same time period as that seen with the non-shuffled pairs. In the tibialis, only 1 out of 31 time-shuffled pairs showed a significant frequency change in one motor unit, and that was in the opposite direction to the frequency changes found in the non-shuffled pairs. It is suggested that the PSF analysis is an important tool for investigating the functional relationship between individual motoneurons as they fire voluntarily.
在人类咬肌和胫骨前肌中,从同时活跃的运动单位对记录到了持续时间较长的脉冲序列。采用了一种创新的分析技术,通过绘制一个运动单位的放电频率相对于另一个运动单位的放电时间(峰周频率图)来研究运动神经元之间的功能耦合。还为每一对构建了放电时间的传统互相关图,以检测同步放电,并将其与峰周频率图(PSF)进行比较。对PSF进行了检验,其假设是,如果两个运动神经元的净共同输入是兴奋性的,那么两个单位的放电频率应该在两个单位同步放电时(即互相关图中的时间零)附近增加。相反,如果净共同输入是抑制性的,那么两个单位的放电频率应该在时间零附近下降。在测试的37对咬肌中,有24对中的一个(n = 20)或两个(n = 4)单位在PSF的时间零附近显示出放电频率有统计学显著增加(P < 0.001)。在测试的37对中的任何一个单位中,从未检测到放电频率有显著下降。发现在有显著同步放电的对(15对中的13对)中,放电率显著增加的发生概率显著高于没有同步放电的对(22对中的11对)(X2 = 5,P < 0.05)。此外,发现在有显著同步活动的对中放电频率的增加百分比(1.4%)显著高于没有同步活动的对(0.74%)。在测试的56对胫骨前肌中,有24对中的一个(n = 19)或两个(n = 5)单位在PSF的时间零附近显示出放电频率有显著变化(P < 0.001)。在PSF中最常检测到在时间零前约20毫秒开始并在时间零左右结束的平均放电率降低,这种情况在有显著同步放电的对(41对中的18对)中发生的概率显著高于没有同步放电的对(15对中的1对)(X2 = 6.7,P < 0.01)。然而,在这个“抑制”阶段放电频率的平均下降百分比在幅度上与是否存在显著同步活动无关(分别为-1.4%和-1.1%)。在许多情况下,这个“抑制”期之后是一个“兴奋”期,此时放电频率显示出显著增加(从时间零过去约6毫秒到20毫秒)。这种放电率的双重变化仅在有显著同步活动的对中发现(41对中的13对)。在“兴奋”阶段,有同步放电的对中放电频率的平均增加百分比显著高于没有同步放电的对(分别为1.4%和0.5%)。通过进行对照分析来评估频率变化的特异性,在对照分析中,一个单位的放电与另一个单位在不同时间(时间打乱的对)的放电进行互相关。在时间打乱的对的互相关图中从未观察到同步峰值。此外,咬肌中的18对时间打乱的对中,没有一对在与未打乱对相同的时间段内显示出显著的频率变化。在胫骨前肌中,31对时间打乱的对中只有1对在一个运动单位中显示出显著的频率变化,并且与在未打乱对中发现的频率变化方向相反。有人认为,PSF分析是研究单个运动神经元在自主放电时功能关系的重要工具。