Miller J A, Zurlo J V
Department of Radiology, UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School, Newark 07103, USA.
Am J Ind Med. 1996 Dec;30(6):726-9. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199612)30:6<726::AID-AJIM9>3.0.CO;2-O.
Previous authors have described several pleural abnormalities on chest radiology as being pathognomonic for asbestos exposure. We sought to determine the percentage of admissions and outpatients at a typical Veteran's Affairs hospital with these findings, and researched medical records to verify the frequency at which patients having positive radiographs were suspected either by clinical/occupational history or radiologically to have had prior significant exposure to asbestos. Radiographs of 1,212 consecutive patients were evaluated by a certified B reader, and the medical records as well as previous radiology reports of all positive patients were reviewed. Twenty-eight (2.3%t) of the radiographs had pleural abnormalities consistent with asbestos exposure, with the patients, all male, ranging in age from 50 to 98 years (mean 75.6). Radiology reports described pleural plaques in only 12 of the 21 (57%) cases with prior exams available; in only seven (33%) was an asbestos etiology considered by the interpreting radiologist. The plaques were misdiagnosed in four instances as being indicative of other, unrelated pathology. A history of known dust exposure was expressed by only five patients (18%). Eleven described working in occupations now known to have a high incidence of exposure, but neither patient nor examining physician expressed consideration of dust inhalation. In conclusion, we have found that a significant percentage of patients in certain subpopulations show radiographic evidence of asbestos exposure that may be a harbinger of related pathology. Unfortunately, because of a low index of suspicion, thorough environmental histories are often deferred, many radiographic changes are either not recognized or are misdiagnosed, and these patients are not followed with the stringent protocols they deserve.
