Suppr超能文献

氟西汀与苯乙肼治疗非典型抑郁症的对比

Fluoxetine versus phenelzine in atypical depression.

作者信息

Pande A C, Birkett M, Fechner-Bates S, Haskett R F, Greden J F

机构信息

University of Michigan Department of Psychiatry, Ann Arbor, USA.

出版信息

Biol Psychiatry. 1996 Nov 15;40(10):1017-20. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(95)00628-1.

Abstract

A study was conducted to compare the relative efficacy of fluoxetine and phenelzine in patients with mood-reactive atypical depression. Forty-two patients with atypical depression by the Columbia criteria were studied in a randomized, double-blind treatment study. Following a single-blind placebo lead-in, patients received fluoxetine 20-60 mg/day or phenelzine 45-90 mg/day for 6 weeks. Efficacy was measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, the Clinical Global Impression (Severity and Improvement) scales, and the Patient Global Impression (Improvement) scale. Of 42 patients randomized, 2 patients never received drugs and 2 phenelzine-treated patients dropped out prior to completion; the remainder completed the 6 weeks of the study. The rates of treatment response did not differ between groups. With a few exceptions (e.g., tremor), phenelzine produced more frequent adverse effects than fluoxetine. It was concluded that fluoxetine is as effective as phenelzine in the treatment of atypical depression, but produces fewer adverse effects and is better tolerated.

摘要

一项研究旨在比较氟西汀和苯乙肼对心境反应性非典型抑郁症患者的相对疗效。采用随机双盲治疗研究方法,对42例符合哥伦比亚标准的非典型抑郁症患者进行了研究。在单盲安慰剂导入期之后,患者接受为期6周的治疗,其中氟西汀剂量为每日20 - 60毫克,苯乙肼剂量为每日45 - 90毫克。疗效通过汉密尔顿抑郁量表、临床总体印象(严重程度和改善情况)量表以及患者总体印象(改善情况)量表进行评估。在随机分组的42例患者中,2例从未接受药物治疗,2例接受苯乙肼治疗的患者在研究完成前退出;其余患者完成了为期6周的研究。两组之间的治疗反应率没有差异。除了少数情况(如震颤)外,苯乙肼产生的不良反应比氟西汀更频繁。研究得出结论,在治疗非典型抑郁症方面,氟西汀与苯乙肼疗效相当,但不良反应更少,耐受性更好。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验