• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

门诊民事强制治疗的有效性。

The effectiveness of outpatient civil commitment.

作者信息

Munetz M R, Grande T, Kleist J, Peterson G A

机构信息

Summit County Alcohol, Drug Addiction, and Mental Health Services Board, Cuyahoga Falls, OH 44221, USA.

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 1996 Nov;47(11):1251-3. doi: 10.1176/ps.47.11.1251.

DOI:10.1176/ps.47.11.1251
PMID:8916245
Abstract

The effects of outpatient civil commitment on community tenure and functioning were studied in a group of 20 patients with a history of recurrent hospitalizations, noncompliance with outpatient treatment, and good response to treatment. During the first 12 months of outpatient commitment, patients experienced significant reductions in visits to the psychiatric emergency service, hospital admissions, and lengths of stay compared with the 12 months before commitment. They significantly increased the number of appointments kept with their psychiatrist. It appears that when used judiciously, outpatient civil commitment is a helpful tool in maintaining hospital recidivists in the community.

摘要

对一组有反复住院史、不遵守门诊治疗且治疗反应良好的20名患者,研究了门诊民事强制治疗对社区居住期限和功能的影响。在门诊强制治疗的前12个月期间,与强制治疗前的12个月相比,患者到精神科急诊服务部门就诊的次数、住院次数和住院时间均显著减少。他们按时就诊精神科医生的次数显著增加。看来,若明智使用,门诊民事强制治疗是让社区中的屡次住院者维持治疗的有用工具。

相似文献

1
The effectiveness of outpatient civil commitment.门诊民事强制治疗的有效性。
Psychiatr Serv. 1996 Nov;47(11):1251-3. doi: 10.1176/ps.47.11.1251.
2
Family members' opinions about civil commitment.家庭成员对民事强制住院的看法。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1990 May;41(5):537-40. doi: 10.1176/ps.41.5.537.
3
The psychometric properties of the Competency Interview Schedule.能力面试量表的心理测量特性。
Can J Psychiatry. 1994 Oct;39(8):368-76. doi: 10.1177/070674379403900804.
4
Assessing the outcome of compulsory treatment orders on management of psychiatric patients at 2 McGill University-associated hospitals.评估 2 所麦吉尔大学附属医院强制性治疗令对精神科患者管理的效果。
Can J Psychiatry. 2012 Jun;57(6):359-65. doi: 10.1177/070674371205700605.
5
Outpatient commitment: what, why, and for whom.门诊治疗承诺:是什么、为什么以及适用于谁。
Psychiatr Serv. 2001 Mar;52(3):337-41. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.3.337.
6
Outpatient civil commitment: a dangerous charade or a component of a comprehensive institution of civil commitment?门诊民事强制住院治疗:一场危险的骗局还是民事强制住院综合制度的一个组成部分?
Psychol Public Policy Law. 2003 Mar-Jun;9(1-2):33-69. doi: 10.1037/1076-8971.9.1-2.33.
7
Involuntary outpatient commitment in Arizona: a retrospective study.亚利桑那州非自愿门诊治疗承诺:一项回顾性研究。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1988 Sep;39(9):953-8. doi: 10.1176/ps.39.9.953.
8
The long-term effect of outpatient commitment on service use.门诊治疗承诺对服务利用的长期影响。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2000 Jul;27(6):383-94. doi: 10.1023/a:1021338208677.
9
Involuntary outpatient civil commitment: what can Britain learn from the U.S. experience? A civil liberties perspective.非自愿门诊民事强制收治:英国能从美国的经验中学到什么?从公民自由的视角来看。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 1995 Summer;18(3):291-303. doi: 10.1016/0160-2527(95)00012-7.
10
Assessing the New York City involuntary outpatient commitment pilot program.评估纽约市非自愿门诊治疗试点项目。
Psychiatr Serv. 2001 Mar;52(3):330-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.3.330.

引用本文的文献

1
Different Patient Group Responses To Community Treatment Orders Suggest Alternative Approaches.不同患者群体对社区治疗令的反应表明了替代方法。
Prof Dev (Phila). 2020;23(2):61-71.
2
The utility of outpatient civil commitment: Investigating the evidence.门诊民事强制收治的效用:证据调查。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2020 May-Jun;70:101565. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101565. Epub 2020 May 23.
3
Community Treatment Orders and Other Forms of Mandatory Outpatient Treatment.社区治疗令及其他形式的强制性门诊治疗。
Can J Psychiatry. 2019 May;64(5):356-374. doi: 10.1177/0706743719845906.
4
Compulsory community treatment to reduce readmission to hospital and increase engagement with community care in people with mental illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.强制社区治疗以减少精神疾病患者再次入院并提高其对社区护理的参与度:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Lancet Psychiatry. 2018 Dec;5(12):1013-1022. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30382-1. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
5
Factors Associated with Rapid Readmission Among Nevada State Psychiatric Hospital Patients.内华达州州立精神病医院患者快速再入院相关因素。
Community Ment Health J. 2019 Jul;55(5):804-810. doi: 10.1007/s10597-018-0316-y. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
6
Compulsory community and involuntary outpatient treatment for people with severe mental disorders.针对严重精神障碍患者的强制社区治疗和非自愿门诊治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 17;3(3):CD004408. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004408.pub5.
7
An advocate's observations on research concerning assisted outpatient treatment.一位倡导者对有关辅助门诊治疗研究的观察。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2014 Mar;16(3):435. doi: 10.1007/s11920-013-0435-7.
8
Compulsory community and involuntary outpatient treatment for people with severe mental disorders.针对严重精神障碍患者的强制社区治疗和非自愿门诊治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Feb 16(2):CD004408. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004408.pub3.
9
Revolving-door patients in a public psychiatric hospital in Israel: cross sectional study.以色列一家公立精神病院的“旋转门”患者:横断面研究。
Croat Med J. 2009 Dec;50(6):575-82. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2009.50.575.
10
Preventing psychiatric hospitalization and involuntary outpatient commitment.预防精神科住院治疗和非自愿门诊治疗。
Soc Work Health Care. 2009;48(3):232-42. doi: 10.1080/00981380802605567.