• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估纽约市非自愿门诊治疗试点项目。

Assessing the New York City involuntary outpatient commitment pilot program.

作者信息

Steadman H J, Gounis K, Dennis D, Hopper K, Roche B, Swartz M, Robbins P C

机构信息

Policy Research Associates, Inc, Delmar, New York, USA 12054.

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 2001 Mar;52(3):330-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.3.330.

DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.52.3.330
PMID:11239100
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The study evaluated the effectiveness of a three-year outpatient commitment pilot program established in 1994 at Bellevue Hospital in New York City.

METHODS

A total of 142 participants were randomly assigned; 78 received court-ordered treatment, which included enhanced services, and 64 received the enhanced-service package only. Between 57 and 68 percent of the subjects completed interviews at one, five, and 11 months after hospital discharge. Outcome measures included rehospitalization, arrest, quality of life, symptomatology, treatment noncompliance, and perceived level of coercion.

RESULTS

On all major outcome measures, no statistically significant differences were found between the two groups. No subject was arrested for a violent crime. Eighteen percent of the court-ordered group and 16 percent of the control group were arrested at least once. The percentage rehospitalized during follow-up was about the same for both groups-51 percent and 42 percent, respectively. The groups did not differ significantly in the total number of days hospitalized during the follow-up period. Participants' perceptions of their quality of life and level of coercion were about the same. From the community service providers' perspective, patients in the two groups were similarly adherent to their required treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

All results must be qualified by the fact that no pick-up order procedures for noncompliant subjects in the court-ordered group were implemented during the study, which compromised the differences between the conditions for the two groups, and that persons with a history of violence were excluded from the program.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了1994年在纽约市贝尔维尤医院设立的一项为期三年的门诊强制治疗试点项目的有效性。

方法

总共142名参与者被随机分配;78人接受了法庭强制治疗,其中包括强化服务,64人仅接受强化服务套餐。57%至68%的受试者在出院后1个月、5个月和11个月完成了访谈。结果指标包括再次住院、被捕情况、生活质量、症状表现、治疗依从性以及感知到的强制程度。

结果

在所有主要结果指标上,两组之间未发现统计学上的显著差异。没有受试者因暴力犯罪被捕。法庭强制治疗组中有18%的人至少被捕过一次,对照组中有16%的人至少被捕过一次。随访期间两组再次住院的比例大致相同,分别为51%和42%。两组在随访期间的总住院天数没有显著差异。参与者对其生活质量和强制程度的感知大致相同。从社区服务提供者的角度来看,两组患者对所需治疗的依从性相似。

结论

所有结果都必须考虑到以下事实:在研究期间,法庭强制治疗组中未对不依从的受试者实施接送程序,这削弱了两组情况之间的差异,并且有暴力史的人被排除在该项目之外。

相似文献

1
Assessing the New York City involuntary outpatient commitment pilot program.评估纽约市非自愿门诊治疗试点项目。
Psychiatr Serv. 2001 Mar;52(3):330-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.3.330.
2
A randomized controlled trial of outpatient commitment in North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州门诊治疗承诺的一项随机对照试验。
Psychiatr Serv. 2001 Mar;52(3):325-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.3.325.
3
Outpatient commitment: what, why, and for whom.门诊治疗承诺:是什么、为什么以及适用于谁。
Psychiatr Serv. 2001 Mar;52(3):337-41. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.3.337.
4
The perceived coerciveness of involuntary outpatient commitment: findings from an experimental study.非自愿门诊治疗的强制感:一项实验研究的结果
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2002;30(2):207-17.
5
Perceived coercion and treatment adherence in an outpatient commitment program.门诊强制治疗项目中的感知到的强制与治疗依从性
Psychiatr Serv. 2003 Mar;54(3):399-401. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.54.3.399.
6
Opening pandora's box: the practical and legal dangers of involuntary outpatient commitment.打开潘多拉魔盒:非自愿门诊治疗的实际与法律风险
Psychiatr Serv. 2001 Mar;52(3):342-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.3.342.
7
Can involuntary outpatient commitment reduce hospital recidivism?: Findings from a randomized trial with severely mentally ill individuals.非自愿门诊治疗能否降低住院率?:一项针对重症精神病患者的随机试验结果。
Am J Psychiatry. 1999 Dec;156(12):1968-75. doi: 10.1176/ajp.156.12.1968.
8
The effectiveness of outpatient civil commitment.门诊民事强制治疗的有效性。
Psychiatr Serv. 1996 Nov;47(11):1251-3. doi: 10.1176/ps.47.11.1251.
9
Outcomes associated with court-ordered treatment over objection in an acute psychiatric hospital.在急性精神病院,针对反对意见进行法院指令治疗的结果。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2013;41(2):236-44.
10
Outcome of involuntary medication in a state hospital system.
Am J Psychiatry. 1991 Apr;148(4):489-94. doi: 10.1176/ajp.148.4.489.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and Social Functioning Outcomes of Assisted Outpatient Treatment: Results From a Multisite Evaluation.辅助门诊治疗的临床与社会功能结果:一项多中心评估的结果
Psychiatr Res Clin Pract. 2025 May 2;7(3):174-181. doi: 10.1176/appi.prcp.20240162. eCollection 2025 Fall.
2
Community Treatment Orders in Australia in the Context of International Literature: A Narrative Review of Consumers, Families and Health Professionals' Perspectives.国际文献背景下的澳大利亚社区治疗令:消费者、家庭及健康专业人员观点的叙述性综述
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2025 Jun;34(3):e70061. doi: 10.1111/inm.70061.
3
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of community treatment orders on aggression or criminal behaviour in people with a mental illness.
社区治疗令对患有精神疾病者的攻击或犯罪行为影响的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2025 Feb 20;34:e12. doi: 10.1017/S2045796025000058.
4
Long term outcomes and causal modelling of compulsory inpatient and outpatient mental health care using Norwegian registry data: Protocol for a controversies in psychiatry research project.利用挪威登记数据对强制住院和门诊精神卫生保健进行长期结果和因果建模:精神病学研究项目中的争议协议
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2023 Jul 8;33(1):e1980. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1980.
5
[Compulsory community treatment orders (CTOs): recent research and future directions].[强制社区治疗令(CTOs):近期研究与未来方向]
BJPsych Open. 2023 May 22;9(3):e86. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2023.71.
6
Community Treatment Orders use Among Persons With a First Episode of Psychosis in Quebec.社区治疗令在魁北克首次出现精神病患者中的应用。
Can J Psychiatry. 2023 Feb;68(2):119-129. doi: 10.1177/07067437221125284. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
7
Impact of diagnosis on outcomes for compulsory treatment orders in New Zealand.诊断对新西兰强制治疗令结果的影响。
BJPsych Open. 2022 Aug 1;8(5):e145. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2022.547.
8
Compulsory Community Treatment Orders in New Zealand and the provision of care: An examination of national databases and predictors of outcome.新西兰的强制社区治疗令与护理提供:对国家数据库及结果预测因素的考察
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2021 Sep 30;17:100275. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100275. eCollection 2021 Dec.
9
Different Patient Group Responses To Community Treatment Orders Suggest Alternative Approaches.不同患者群体对社区治疗令的反应表明了替代方法。
Prof Dev (Phila). 2020;23(2):61-71.
10
Caring for Persons with Serious Mental Illness: Policy and Practice Suggestions.关爱重度精神疾病患者:政策与实践建议
Soc Work Ment Health. 2003;1(3):1-17. doi: 10.1300/j200v01n03_01.