Suppr超能文献

冠状动脉支架置入术后单用阿司匹林与阿司匹林加噻氯匹定的比较。

Comparison of aspirin alone versus aspirin plus ticlopidine after coronary artery stenting.

作者信息

Goods C M, al-Shaibi K F, Liu M W, Yadav J S, Mathur A, Jain S P, Dean L S, Iyer S S, Parks J M, Roubin G S

机构信息

Cardiovascular Division, University of Alabama at Birmingham 35294, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1996 Nov 1;78(9):1042-4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00532-2.

Abstract

This prospective nonrandomized study was performed comparing aspirin alone (n = 46) versus aspirin and ticlopidine (p = 338) following native coronary artery stenting. There were significantly more stent thrombosis events in the aspirin-only group than in the aspirin and ticlopidine group (6.5% vs 0.9%, p = 0.02) and significantly more Q-wave myocardial infarctions and cardiac-related deaths in the aspirin-only group than in the aspirin and ticlopidine group (6.5% vs 0%, p = 0.002 and 4.4% vs 0.3% p = 0.02, respectively).

摘要

这项前瞻性非随机研究比较了单纯使用阿司匹林(n = 46)与阿司匹林和噻氯匹定联合使用(n = 338)在自体冠状动脉支架置入术后的情况。单纯使用阿司匹林组的支架血栓形成事件显著多于阿司匹林和噻氯匹定联合使用组(6.5% 对 0.9%,p = 0.02),且单纯使用阿司匹林组的Q波心肌梗死和心脏相关死亡显著多于阿司匹林和噻氯匹定联合使用组(分别为6.5% 对 0%,p = 0.002;4.4% 对 0.3%,p = 0.02)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验