Suppr超能文献

使用非放射性碘海醇测量肾小球滤过率:两种单室模型的比较。

Measurement of glomerular filtration rate using nonradioactive Iohexol: comparison of two one-compartment models.

作者信息

Rocco M V, Buckalew V M, Moore L C, Shihabi Z K

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Nephrology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, N.C., USA.

出版信息

Am J Nephrol. 1996;16(2):138-43. doi: 10.1159/000168985.

Abstract

Radioisotopic methods for the determination of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) are highly accurate but require the collection of multiple blood and urine samples and are costly to perform due to personnel, material, and analysis costs. Nonradioactive methods of GFR determination have the potential of minimizing procedure costs while preserving accuracy. We determined the GFR simultaneously by 125I-iothalamate and nonradioactive iohexol clearance methods in 41 adults. The study group consisted of 54% males, with a mean age of 50.7 (range 28-79) years and a mean GFR by 125I-iothalamate clearance of 66.5 +/- 28.3 (range 10-118) ml/min. The iohexol concentrations were measured by a simplified high-performance liquid chromatography method that did not require sample preparation. The iohexol plasma clearance was calculated by both a new one-compartment model as well as by Jacobsson's one-compartment model. Using Jacobsson's single-sample model and data from the 240-min point, there was an excellent correlation between 125 I-iothalamate and nonradioactive iohexol clearance values: r2 = 0.95, standard error of the estimate = 11.4 ml/min, and intrapatient coefficient of variation = 16.9%. However, this formula tended to overestimate GFRs < 30 ml/min and to underestimate GFRs > 80 ml/min. The new one-compartment model is a modification of Bubeck's model, originally used for the determination of renal plasma blood flow. Using this modified model, there was an excellent correlation between 125I-iothalamate and nonradioactive iohexol clearance values at all levels of GFR tested: r2 = 0.95, standard error of the estimate = 9.2 ml/min, and intrapatient coefficient of variation = 13.7%. In conclusion, the determination of the plasma clearance of iohexol by a nonradioactive technique and a monoexponential model is a simple and accurate method of determining the GFR in patients with varying degrees of renal impairment.

摘要

用于测定肾小球滤过率(GFR)的放射性同位素方法高度准确,但需要采集多个血液和尿液样本,并且由于人员、材料和分析成本,执行起来费用高昂。非放射性的GFR测定方法有可能在保持准确性的同时将程序成本降至最低。我们采用¹²⁵I-碘他拉酸盐和非放射性碘海醇清除率方法对41名成年人同时进行了GFR测定。研究组中男性占54%,平均年龄为50.7岁(范围28 - 79岁),通过¹²⁵I-碘他拉酸盐清除率测得的平均GFR为66.5±28.3(范围10 - 118)ml/分钟。碘海醇浓度通过一种无需样本制备的简化高效液相色谱法进行测量。碘海醇血浆清除率通过一种新的单室模型以及雅各布森单室模型进行计算。使用雅各布森单样本模型以及240分钟时间点的数据,¹²⁵I-碘他拉酸盐和非放射性碘海醇清除率值之间存在极好的相关性:r² = 0.95,估计标准误差 = 11.4 ml/分钟,患者内变异系数 = 16.9%。然而,该公式往往会高估GFR<30 ml/分钟的情况,并低估GFR>80 ml/分钟的情况。新的单室模型是对最初用于测定肾血浆血流量的布贝克模型的改进。使用这个改进模型,在所有测试的GFR水平上,¹²⁵I-碘他拉酸盐和非放射性碘海醇清除率值之间都存在极好的相关性:r² = 0.95,估计标准误差 = 9.2 ml/分钟,患者内变异系数 = 13.7%。总之,通过非放射性技术和单指数模型测定碘海醇的血浆清除率是一种简单而准确的方法,可用于测定不同程度肾功能损害患者的GFR。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验