Lasagna L
Fed Proc. 1977 Sep;36(10):2349-51.
Objections to prison research are based more often on opposition to the evils of prison life than to unethical practices and to the memories of atrocities committed in the name of science in Nazi prison camps during World War II. The National Commission's pronouncements on prison research specifically illustrate this general phenomenon. Having decided that research on prisoners can be performed ethically, and having learned that most prisoner volunteers bitterly resent being deprived of the opportunity to participate in research, the Commission has nevertheless stipulated prison conditions that cannot realistically be met and thus has de facto eliminated such research. The most serious potential loss is the elimination of the unique facility in Lexington, Kentucky--the Addiction Research Center. Predicting the addiction liability of drugs is not likely to be feasible in any nonprison setting, so that the addiction potential of new marketed drugs will be established in the future as it was in the past--by trial-and-error in patients, who will become the unwilling, uninformed research subjects in this area.
对监狱研究的反对意见更多地基于对监狱生活罪恶的反对,而非不道德行为,以及对二战期间纳粹集中营以科学之名犯下暴行的记忆。国家委员会关于监狱研究的声明具体说明了这一普遍现象。在认定对囚犯进行研究可以符合伦理道德,并了解到大多数囚犯志愿者对被剥夺参与研究的机会深感不满之后,该委员会却规定了一些现实中无法满足的监狱条件,从而事实上取消了此类研究。最严重的潜在损失是肯塔基州列克星敦市独一无二的设施——成瘾研究中心的消失。在任何非监狱环境中,预测药物的成瘾可能性都不太可行,因此未来新上市药物的成瘾潜力将像过去一样——通过在患者身上反复试验来确定,而这些患者将成为这一领域不情愿、不知情的研究对象。