Riedel W J, Jolles J
Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, University of Limburg, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Drugs Aging. 1996 Apr;8(4):245-74. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199608040-00003.
A review of recently published studies on the effect of cognition enhancers in non-demented human study participants is presented. The heterogeneity of the therapeutic target, age-associated cognitive decline, can be improved by separately treating groups in whom age-extrinsic factors may underlie cognitive pathology. Standardisation of cognitive assessments is necessary, since many different tests are applied to answer the same question. Modelling cognitive dysfunction, either by pharmacological or nonpharmacological means, in humans is highly recommended since it allows hypotheses to be tested in a clearly operationalised way. Predictive validity of the currently applied models for the clinical situation remains a problem, however. The scopolamine (hyoscine) model has, to a reasonable extent, predictive validity for the cholinergic agents. The results of 67 single-dose studies and 30 multiple-dose studies are summarised. All single-dose studies and 14 multiple-dose studies were carried out in young or elderly human volunteers. In 45 of 81 volunteer studies, models of cognitive dysfunction were employed. The scopolamine model was the most used (n = 21); the other studies induced cognitive dysfunction by means of benzodiazepines (8), hypoxia (7), alcohol (5) and sleep-deprivation (4). The remaining 16 multiple-dose studies were clinical trials of a duration varying between 2 weeks and 1 year (average duration was 14 weeks). In these trials, the effects of cognition enhancers were assessed in elderly people in whom impairment of memory, psychomotor performance or cognitive function was determined. These included age-associated memory impairment (AAMI) and age-associated cognitive decline (AACD). There were many studies in which the cognition enhancing properties of substances in humans were reliably demonstrated. The cognition enhancing properties of substances that are widely used, such as caffeine, nicotine and vitamins, may already be active against AACD. New developments such as serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine3; 5-HT3) antagonists and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists have provided marginal and disappointing results in AAMI. There is no cognition enhancer that has reliably and repeatedly been demonstrated to be efficacious for the treatment of AACD. However, this situation may change as the selectivity, specificity and adverse effect profiles of substances that are being developed for the treatment of AD may be expected to be improved in the future.
本文综述了最近发表的关于认知增强剂对非痴呆人类研究参与者影响的研究。治疗靶点年龄相关性认知衰退具有异质性,通过分别治疗年龄外在因素可能是认知病理学基础的人群,这种异质性可以得到改善。认知评估的标准化是必要的,因为为回答同一个问题应用了许多不同的测试。强烈建议在人类中通过药理学或非药理学方法模拟认知功能障碍,因为这能以清晰可操作的方式检验假设。然而,目前应用的模型对临床情况的预测效度仍然是个问题。东莨菪碱模型在一定程度上对胆碱能药物具有预测效度。总结了67项单剂量研究和30项多剂量研究的结果。所有单剂量研究和14项多剂量研究是在年轻或老年人类志愿者中进行的。在81项志愿者研究中的45项中,采用了认知功能障碍模型。东莨菪碱模型使用最多(n = 21);其他研究通过苯二氮䓬类药物(8项)、缺氧(7项)、酒精(5项)和睡眠剥夺(4项)诱导认知功能障碍。其余16项多剂量研究是持续时间在2周和1年之间(平均持续时间为14周)的临床试验。在这些试验中,评估了认知增强剂对已确定存在记忆、精神运动表现或认知功能损害的老年人的影响。这些包括年龄相关性记忆损害(AAMI)和年龄相关性认知衰退(AACD)。有许多研究可靠地证明了物质在人类中的认知增强特性。广泛使用的物质如咖啡因、尼古丁和维生素的认知增强特性可能已经对AACD有作用。5-羟色胺(5-羟色胺3;5-HT3)拮抗剂和N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)拮抗剂等新进展在AAMI中取得的效果有限且令人失望。没有一种认知增强剂被可靠且反复证明对治疗AACD有效。然而,随着为治疗阿尔茨海默病而研发的物质的选择性、特异性和不良反应谱有望在未来得到改善,这种情况可能会改变。