Suppr超能文献

宫内节育器的长期安全性和使用有效性。

Long-term safety and use-effectiveness of intrauterine devices.

作者信息

Kaye B M, Reaney B V, Kaye D L, Edelman D A

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 1977 Sep;28(9):937-42.

PMID:892045
Abstract

The long-term safety and effectiveness of Lippes Loops, A, C, and D, Dalkon Shields, Saf-T-Coils, and Cu 7-200 intrauterine devices (IUDs) were evaluated on the basis of 670 insertions in 588 women. Ten-year life-table rates for the Lippes Loops C (291 first insertions) and D (213 first insertions) were evaluated. The Loop C was consistently associated with a significantly higher expulsion rate but lower pregnancy rate as compared with the Loop D. Over-all, the removal rates for these two IUDs were similar. The incidence of pelvic infection and abnormal Papanicolaou smears, the time from IUD removal to conception, pregnancy outcome, and the need for any surgery post-IUD insertion were evaluated for all IUDs and all segments of use.

摘要

基于588名女性的670次宫内节育器(IUD)置入情况,对利普斯A、C、D型节育器、达康盾、安全-T-节育器和铜7-200型宫内节育器的长期安全性和有效性进行了评估。对利普斯C型(291例首次置入)和D型(213例首次置入)节育器的10年生命表率进行了评估。与D型节育器相比,C型节育器始终与显著更高的排出率但更低的妊娠率相关。总体而言,这两种宫内节育器的取出率相似。对所有宫内节育器及其使用的各个阶段,评估了盆腔感染和巴氏涂片异常的发生率、从取出宫内节育器到受孕的时间、妊娠结局以及宫内节育器置入后任何手术的需求。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验