Suppr超能文献

老年患者白内障手术球周麻醉前的静脉镇静

Intravenous sedation prior to peribulbar anaesthesia for cataract surgery in elderly patients.

作者信息

Wong D H, Merrick P M

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Anaesth. 1996 Nov;43(11):1115-20. doi: 10.1007/BF03011837.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate if pre-block iv sedation using midazolam, alfentanil, or a midazolam-alfentanil combination minimizes pain, reduces pain recall, and attenuates haemodynamic responses to peribulbar block; and to determine other factors influencing oxygen saturation (SpO2) following iv sedation.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 120 patients, mean age 73 yr, having cataract surgery with peribular anaesthesia, were randomized to receive either normal saline, 1 mg midazolam, 500 micrograms alfentanil, or 0.5 mg midazolam plus 250 micrograms alfentanil. Blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR) and pulse oximetry readings were recorded before injection of the study drugs, immediately after completion of the peribulbar block, and 10 min after the block. Pain from the anaesthetic block was assessed immediately after the block and after surgery using a visual analog scale, and recall of pain was assessed by telephone on the day after surgery.

RESULTS

Pain scores were low in all four groups. Midazolam-alfentanil reduced pain perception, and all iv sedation used reduced pain recall. Midazolam reduced systolic BP; alfentanil +/- midazolam reduced HR. All iv sedation reduced SpO2 more than did saline, but not usually to a clinically important level. Nine patients had a SpO2 < or = 90%; all had received alfentanil with or without midazolam. It was not possible to predict oxygen saturation levels by any factors other than iv sedation and baseline SpO2 levels.

CONCLUSION

Intravenous sedation with midazolam or alfentanil or in combination reduced pain perception, pain recall, and haemodynamic responses from peribulbar anaesthesia. Fifteen percent of patients given alfentanil developed clinically important oxygen desaturation. The use of fine gauge needles combined with slow injection of anaesthetic solution causes minimal discomfort, and routine iv sedation may be unnecessary.

摘要

目的

研究使用咪达唑仑、阿芬太尼或咪达唑仑 - 阿芬太尼联合进行球后阻滞前静脉镇静是否能将疼痛降至最低、减少疼痛回忆并减弱对球后阻滞的血流动力学反应;并确定静脉镇静后影响血氧饱和度(SpO2)的其他因素。

方法

在一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究中,120例平均年龄73岁、接受球周麻醉白内障手术的患者被随机分为接受生理盐水、1毫克咪达唑仑、500微克阿芬太尼或0.5毫克咪达唑仑加250微克阿芬太尼。在注射研究药物前、球后阻滞完成后即刻以及阻滞后10分钟记录血压(BP)、心率(HR)和脉搏血氧饱和度读数。使用视觉模拟量表在阻滞后即刻和手术后评估麻醉阻滞引起的疼痛,并在术后第一天通过电话评估疼痛回忆。

结果

所有四组的疼痛评分均较低。咪达唑仑 - 阿芬太尼降低了疼痛感知,所有使用的静脉镇静均减少了疼痛回忆。咪达唑仑降低收缩压;阿芬太尼±咪达唑仑降低心率。所有静脉镇静比生理盐水更能降低SpO2,但通常未降至临床重要水平。9例患者的SpO2≤90%;所有患者均接受了阿芬太尼,无论是否联合咪达唑仑。除静脉镇静和基线SpO2水平外,无法通过任何其他因素预测血氧饱和度水平。

结论

静脉注射咪达唑仑或阿芬太尼或联合使用可降低球后麻醉引起的疼痛感知、疼痛回忆和血流动力学反应。给予阿芬太尼的患者中有15%出现了具有临床意义的氧饱和度降低。使用细针并缓慢注射麻醉溶液引起的不适最小,常规静脉镇静可能不必要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验