• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)用于治疗老年抑郁症患者:关于其疗效和副作用的文献定性分析

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in the treatment of elderly depressed patients: a qualitative analysis of the literature on their efficacy and side-effects.

作者信息

Menting J E, Honig A, Verhey F R, Hartmans M, Rozendaal N, de Vet H C, van Praag H M

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, University of Limburg Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1996 Sep;11(3):165-75. doi: 10.1097/00004850-199609000-00003.

DOI:10.1097/00004850-199609000-00003
PMID:8923095
Abstract

A qualitative analysis of studies on the efficacy and side-effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for the treatment of elderly people with depression is presented. Only placebo-controlled or comparison studies of SSRI versus other antidepressants were included. The description and methodological quality of the analysed studies were important criteria in the outcome of the analysis. Quality was assessed by means of a blinded review approach. After excluding duplicate publications, 16 studies were analysed, of which six turned out to be of good quality. The results indicated that at the end of the treatment periods (4-8 weeks) all antidepressants were equally effective. Side-effects occurred less frequently with SSRIs than with tricyclics (TCAs), and different side-effect profiles were found. Significantly fewer SSRI-treated patients than TCA-treated patients dropped out both overall and due to side-effects.

摘要

本文对选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)治疗老年抑郁症患者的疗效和副作用研究进行了定性分析。仅纳入了SSRI与其他抗抑郁药的安慰剂对照或对比研究。所分析研究的描述和方法学质量是分析结果的重要标准。通过盲法评审方法评估质量。在排除重复发表的文献后,分析了16项研究,其中6项质量良好。结果表明,在治疗期结束时(4至8周),所有抗抑郁药疗效相当。SSRI的副作用发生率低于三环类抗抑郁药(TCA),且发现了不同的副作用特征。总体而言以及因副作用而退出研究的SSRI治疗患者明显少于TCA治疗患者。

相似文献

1
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in the treatment of elderly depressed patients: a qualitative analysis of the literature on their efficacy and side-effects.选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)用于治疗老年抑郁症患者:关于其疗效和副作用的文献定性分析
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1996 Sep;11(3):165-75. doi: 10.1097/00004850-199609000-00003.
2
[Sexual dysfunction secondary to SSRIs. A comparative analysis in 308 patients].[选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂继发的性功能障碍。308例患者的对比分析]
Actas Luso Esp Neurol Psiquiatr Cienc Afines. 1996 Nov-Dec;24(6):311-21.
3
Depression: making the diagnosis and using SSRIs in the older patient.
Geriatrics. 1996 Oct;51(10):28-34.
4
Heterogeneity of SSRI response.选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)反应的异质性
Harv Rev Psychiatry. 1996 Nov-Dec;4(4):215-7. doi: 10.3109/10673229609030546.
5
Targeted pharmacotherapy in depression management: comparative pharmacokinetics of fluoxetine, paroxetine and sertraline.抑郁症治疗中的靶向药物治疗:氟西汀、帕罗西汀和舍曲林的比较药代动力学
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1994 Jun;9 Suppl 3:13-9. doi: 10.1142/9789814440912_0082.
6
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: pharmacologic profiles and potential therapeutic distinctions.选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂:药理学特性及潜在治疗差异
Ann Pharmacother. 1994 Dec;28(12):1359-69. doi: 10.1177/106002809402801207.
7
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor discontinuation syndrome: a randomized clinical trial.选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂停药综合征:一项随机临床试验
Biol Psychiatry. 1998 Jul 15;44(2):77-87. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(98)00126-7.
8
Use of serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors in geriatric depression.5-羟色胺选择性再摄取抑制剂在老年抑郁症中的应用。
J Clin Psychiatry. 1996;57 Suppl 5:12-22.
9
Paroxetine, sertraline, and fluvoxamine: new selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.帕罗西汀、舍曲林和氟伏沙明:新型选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂
Clin Pharm. 1992 Nov;11(11):930-57.
10
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for depressive disorders in children and adolescents.用于儿童和青少年抑郁症的选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18(3):CD004851. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004851.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence and treatment of diagnosed depression among elderly nursing home residents in Ohio.俄亥俄州老年疗养院居民中已确诊抑郁症的患病率及治疗情况。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2007 Nov;8(9):585-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2007.07.010. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
2
[Psychopharmacotherapy in advanced age].[老年期精神药物治疗]
Internist (Berl). 2003 Aug;44(8):936-42. doi: 10.1007/s00108-003-0938-0.
3
Evaluation of patient outcomes in an area where prescribing of anticholinergic antidepressants was influenced by academic detailing.在抗胆碱能抗抑郁药处方受学术推广影响的地区对患者预后进行评估。
Pharm World Sci. 2002 Aug;24(4):144-8. doi: 10.1023/a:1019559301580.
4
Clinically significant drug interactions with antidepressants in the elderly.老年人中与抗抑郁药具有临床意义的药物相互作用。
Drugs Aging. 2002;19(4):299-320. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200219040-00004.
5
Paroxetine: a review.帕罗西汀:综述
CNS Drug Rev. 2001 Spring;7(1):25-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-3458.2001.tb00189.x.
6
Reducing prescribing of highly anticholinergic antidepressants for elderly people: randomised trial of group versus individual academic detailing.减少老年人高抗胆碱能性抗抑郁药的处方:小组与个体学术详述的随机试验
BMJ. 2001 Mar 17;322(7287):654-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7287.654.
7
[La depresión en el anciano].[老年人的抑郁症]
Aten Primaria. 2000 Sep 30;26(5):339-46. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(00)78677-x.
8
Antidepressants in the elderly: challenges for study design and their interpretation.老年人使用抗抑郁药:研究设计及其解读面临的挑战
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2000 Jun;49(6):539-47. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2000.00201.x.
9
Choosing appropriate antidepressant therapy in the elderly. A risk-benefit assessment of available agents.为老年人选择合适的抗抑郁治疗。对现有药物的风险效益评估。
Drugs Aging. 1998 Oct;13(4):269-80. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199813040-00003.