Suppr超能文献

减少老年人高抗胆碱能性抗抑郁药的处方:小组与个体学术详述的随机试验

Reducing prescribing of highly anticholinergic antidepressants for elderly people: randomised trial of group versus individual academic detailing.

作者信息

van Eijk M E, Avorn J, Porsius A J, de Boer A

机构信息

OZ zorgverzekeringen, Breda, Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ. 2001 Mar 17;322(7287):654-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7287.654.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect of individual educational visits versus group visits using academic detailing to discuss prescribing of highly anticholinergic antidepressants in elderly people.

DESIGN

Randomised controlled trial with three arms (individual visits, group visits, and a control arm).

SETTING

Southwest Netherlands.

PARTICIPANTS

190 general practitioners and 37 pharmacists organised in 21 peer review groups were studied using a database covering all prescriptions to people covered by national health insurance in the area (about 240 000).

INTERVENTION

All general practitioners and pharmacists in both intervention arms were offered two educational visits. For physicians in groups randomised to the individual visit arm, 43 of 70 general practitioners participated; in the group visit intervention arm, five of seven groups (41 of 52 general practitioners) participated.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Numbers of elderly people (>/=60 years) with new prescriptions of highly anticholinergic antidepressants and less anticholinergic antidepressants.

RESULTS

An intention to treat analysis found a 26% reduction in the rate of starting highly anticholinergic antidepressants in elderly people (95% confidence interval -4% to 48%) in the individual intervention arm and 45% (8% to 67%) in the group intervention arm. The use of less anticholinergic antidepressants increased by 40% (6% to 83%) in the individual intervention arm and 29% (-7% to 79%) in the group intervention arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the individual and the group visits decreased the use of highly anticholinergic antidepressants and increased the use of less anticholinergic antidepressant in elderly people. These approaches are practical means to improve prescribing by continuing medical education.

摘要

目的

比较采用学术推广方式进行的个体教育性访视与团体访视,在讨论老年人使用高抗胆碱能性抗抑郁药处方方面的效果。

设计

三臂随机对照试验(个体访视、团体访视和对照组)。

地点

荷兰西南部。

参与者

190名全科医生和37名药剂师,他们被组织成21个同行评审小组,研究使用了一个涵盖该地区所有参加国家医疗保险人员(约24万)处方的数据库。

干预措施

两个干预组的所有全科医生和药剂师都接受了两次教育性访视。随机分配到个体访视组的70名全科医生中,有43名参与;在团体访视干预组中,7个小组中的5个(52名全科医生中的41名)参与。

主要观察指标

开具高抗胆碱能性抗抑郁药新处方的老年人(≥60岁)数量以及使用抗胆碱能性较低的抗抑郁药的情况。

结果

意向性分析发现,个体干预组中老年人开始使用高抗胆碱能性抗抑郁药的比例降低了26%(95%置信区间为-4%至48%),团体干预组降低了45%(8%至67%)。个体干预组中使用抗胆碱能性较低的抗抑郁药的比例增加了40%(6%至83%),团体干预组增加了29%(-7%至79%)。

结论

个体访视和团体访视均减少了老年人高抗胆碱能性抗抑郁药的使用,并增加了抗胆碱能性较低的抗抑郁药的使用。这些方法是通过继续医学教育改善处方开具的实用手段。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3
Systematic literature review of the impact of psychiatric pharmacists.精神科药剂师影响的系统文献综述
Ment Health Clin. 2024 Feb 1;14(1):33-67. doi: 10.9740/mhc.2024.02.033. eCollection 2024 Feb.
7
Academic detailing as a method of continuing medical education.学术推广作为继续医学教育的一种方法。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019 Aug 30;10:717-725. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S206073. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

4
Depression in the elderly--falls and pitfalls.老年人的抑郁症——跌倒与陷阱
N Engl J Med. 1998 Sep 24;339(13):918-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199809243391311.
5
Depressive disorders and other emotional issues in the elderly: current issues.老年人的抑郁症及其他情绪问题:当前问题
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1997 Dec;12 Suppl 7:S37-42. doi: 10.1097/00004850-199712007-00007.
6
EUR-ASSESS Project Subgroup Report on Dissemination and Impact.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1997 Spring;13(2):220-86. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300010370.
7
Influencing prescribing in primary care: a comparison of two different prescribing feedback methods.
J Clin Pharm Ther. 1996 Aug;21(4):247-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.1996.tb01146.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验