Bisset S A, Morris C A
AgResearch Wallaceville, Upper Hutt, New Zealand.
Int J Parasitol. 1996 Aug-Sep;26(8-9):857-68. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(96)80056-7.
There are potentially 2 different types of host response which could be targeted when seeking to breed sheep which require minimal frequency of anthelmintic treatment to maintain acceptable health and productivity in the face of nematode challenge. These are "resistance" (the ability to suppress the establishment and/or subsequent development of a parasite infection), and "resilience" (the ability to maintain relatively undepressed production while subjected to parasite challenge). Most studies have concentrated on resistance, and used faecal worm egg count (FEC) as the selection criterion. However, in Romney sheep in New Zealand, it has become apparent that "resistance to infection" does not equate to "disease resistance" in the strict sense. Although genetically low FEC Romney lambs have been shown to have significantly reduced burdens of the most important nematode species, they nevertheless appear to have no significant production advantages over their higher FEC counterparts when all are grazed together under the same larval challenge. Furthermore there is evidence of an unfavourable association between FEC and dagginess (soiling of the breech area) suggesting that some forms of host response to nematode challenge may result in diarrhoea. Our results suggest that the main benefits of selectively breeding for low FEC are likely to be derived indirectly as a result of reduced pasture contamination. This has led us to investigate resilience as a possible alternative breeding option to resistance. Over a period of 3 years approximately 14,000 progeny of 213 different rams were tested for resilience (assessed in terms of drench requirements using an individual "on demand" treatment procedure), as well as growth rate, dag-score, FEC and fleece-weight. Overall the heritabilities of various measures of resilience examined proved to be relatively low (ranging between 0.10 +/- 0.03 and 0.19 +/- 0.04), although estimates varied between flocks and years possibly as a result of differences in the severity of challenge. Nevertheless, results suggested that progeny-test selection for resilience would lead to lambs with higher growth rates and lower dags-scores when left undrenched on infective pasture. In contrast to some Australian results we found no positive association between resilience to mematode challenge and resistance to infection. If the potential benefits of both resistance and resilience are to be captured our results suggest that an index selection procedure will be needed.
在培育对驱虫药治疗频率要求最低,以便在面对线虫挑战时仍能保持可接受的健康水平和生产力的绵羊时,可能有两种不同类型的宿主反应可供选择。这两种反应分别是“抗性”(抑制寄生虫感染的建立和/或后续发展的能力)和“恢复力”(在受到寄生虫挑战时保持相对不受抑制的生产能力)。大多数研究都集中在抗性上,并将粪便虫卵计数(FEC)作为选择标准。然而,在新西兰的罗姆尼羊中,很明显,“抗感染能力”在严格意义上并不等同于“抗病能力”。尽管基因上FEC较低的罗姆尼羔羊已被证明其体内最重要线虫种类的负担显著减轻,但当所有羔羊在相同的幼虫挑战下一起放牧时,它们似乎并没有比FEC较高的同类羔羊具有显著的生产优势。此外,有证据表明FEC与臀部脏污(后躯区域弄脏)之间存在不利关联,这表明宿主对线虫挑战的某些反应形式可能会导致腹泻。我们的结果表明,选择性培育低FEC的主要好处可能是由于牧场污染减少而间接获得的。这促使我们研究将恢复力作为抗性的一种可能替代育种选择。在3年的时间里,对213只不同公羊的约14000只后代进行了恢复力测试(使用个体“按需”治疗程序根据驱虫需求进行评估),以及生长速度、脏污评分、FEC和羊毛重量测试。总体而言,所检查的各种恢复力指标的遗传力相对较低(在0.10±0.03至0.19±0.04之间),尽管估计值在不同羊群和年份之间有所不同,这可能是由于挑战严重程度的差异所致。然而,结果表明,对恢复力进行后代测试选择将导致羔羊在感染性牧场上不进行驱虫时具有更高的生长速度和更低的脏污评分。与一些澳大利亚的结果相反,我们发现对线虫挑战的恢复力与抗感染能力之间没有正相关。如果要同时获得抗性和恢复力的潜在好处,我们的结果表明需要一种指数选择程序。